Rules of Privatization: Contradictions in Neoliberal Regulation of North Pacific Fisheries

Abstract

Recent changes in fisheries regulation in the U.S. North Pacific reveal how neoliberalism is constituted in practice, and the forms that neoliberalism takes when it engages with environmental management and ecological processes. Whereas neoliberalism can be taken as a political economic philosophy that posits that markets, without state involvement, can best allocate resources, the history and practice of neoliberalism show that it is not as unified as it often appears. Analysis of contemporary fisheries policy reveals not only contradictions in neoliberal approaches, but also how those contradictions are shaped by the environmental context of the industry. This article discusses the rationale for neoliberalism in fisheries and the governance changes enacted in the 1998 American Fisheries Act, which privatized the fishery for Alaska pollock by closing the fishery to all new entrants, providing a set percentage of the yearly catch to ''cooperatives'' of participants, and allowing individuals to lease their shares. Karl Polanyi's notion of the ''double movement'' provides a framework to argue that even though regulators tout these reforms because they rely on market mechanisms to resolve recalcitrant ecological and economic problems in these fisheries, writing and implementing the act simultaneously involved complex rule making designed to protect the market. This form of neoliberalism results from the history of fisheries regulation, including recent emphasis on cooperative management, and the ecological characteristics of marine fish. Moves to privatize the oceans entail developing distinctive forms of neoliberal practice that uniquely combine private industry and government regulation. Because fish are one of the last great resource commons, neoliberal approaches to fisheries mark a profound geographical transformation in the political economy of the oceans.

Pimping Climate Change: Richard Branson, Global Warming, and the Performance of Green Capitalism

“…For example, Malthus (1993Malthus ( [1798), in addition to his (in)famous embrace of famine and disease as`natural' or what he called`preventive' checks on population growth, also stated that:`i t appears, that a society constituted according to the most beautiful form that imagination can conceive, with benevolence for its moving principle, instead of self-love, and with every evil disposition in all its members corrected by reason and not force, would, from the inevitable laws of nature, and not from any original depravity of man [sic], in a very short period degenerate into a society constructed upon a plan not essentially different from that which prevails in every known state at present; I mean, a society divided into a class of proprietors, and a class of labourers, and with self-love the main-spring of the great machine'' (Malthus, 1993(Malthus, [1798, pages 64^65). There is, of course, much more to be said about green capitalism, its origins, and a proliferation of market fundamentalism in contemporary environmental policy making (see eg Goldman, 2005;Heynen et al, 2007;Krueger and Gibbs, 2007;Liverman, 2004;McAfee, 1999;Mansfield, 2004a;2004b;. But the point is that markets, more or less accurate prices, enclosures of various kinds, a faith in the choices of ostensibly independent and rational individuals, and investment of capital by innovative entrepreneurs constitute the ubiquitous tropes of green capitalism.…”

Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment: A Synthesis and Evaluation of the Research

“…But the amendment was also designed so that overseas interests had to have domestic partners, a way of trying to make external investment pay dividends for certain Guyanese nationals. In contrast to Bridge's land-based study, Mansfield's (2004aMansfield's ( , 2004bMansfield's ( , 2007b In respect of the third situation identified above, geographer Scott Prudham (2007) analyses a 2004 Canadian Supreme Court decision to reject a Monsanto patent claim covering genetically modified canola. Prudham focuses on the legal complications attendant on trying to abstract discursively parts of nature from their social and environmental integument in order to present them as putatively 'autonomous inventions' by the likes of Monsanto.…”

“…This concentrated water management rights in the hands of one large company, Aguas Argentinas. Studies of the second situation identified above include those by Thomas Perreault (2005Perreault ( , 2006, Diana Davis (2006), Gavin Bridge (2002 and Becky Mansfield (2004aMansfield ( , 2004bMansfield ( , 2007b. Perreault (2005) focuses on the legal enclosure of Bolivia's water resources in the 1990s and gas resources too (Perreault, 2006).…”

Embedding Carbon Markets: Complicating Commodification of Ecosystem Services in Mexico's Forests

“…The scholarship on the commodification and neoliberalization of nature has received widespread attention from geographers (Castree 2003;Liverman 2004;McCarthy and Prudham 2004;Bakker 2010), particularly with regard to the impacts on marginalized communities and the nonhuman world (Mansfield 2004;Heynen and Robbins 2005). Neoliberalism has been described as a hybrid project based on the myth of the self-regulating market in which everything, including nature, becomes commodified (Peck and Tickell 2002;Larner 2003;McCarthy and Prudham 2004).…”