2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2369317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruling Elites' Rotation and Asset Ownership: Implications for Property Rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This empirical strategy assumes that random exits cause political instability, making successors less confident about their hold on power and hence more amenable to putting restrictions on expropriation. Polishchuk and Syunyaev (2015) arrive to a similar conclusion by positing that incumbent rulers form expectation about their political survival based on the recent history, and by relating the quality of property rights protection to the actual rate of power shifts over a preceding period (see also the model below in this chapter). They demonstrate that in non-democracies elites' rotation has positive and statistically significant impact on property rights.…”
Section: Importance Of (Not) Being Stationarymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This empirical strategy assumes that random exits cause political instability, making successors less confident about their hold on power and hence more amenable to putting restrictions on expropriation. Polishchuk and Syunyaev (2015) arrive to a similar conclusion by positing that incumbent rulers form expectation about their political survival based on the recent history, and by relating the quality of property rights protection to the actual rate of power shifts over a preceding period (see also the model below in this chapter). They demonstrate that in non-democracies elites' rotation has positive and statistically significant impact on property rights.…”
Section: Importance Of (Not) Being Stationarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 Similar assumptions are made in Besley and Persson (2011) and Besley et al (2012). 5 Polishchuk and Syunyaev's (2015) model power shifts by a continuous Poisson process, and assumes a distributed lag in institutional changes. 6 Concavity implies risk-aversion and hence the reluctance to accept sharp income fluctuations caused by power shifts.…”
Section: Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation