2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruling Out Legionella in Community-acquired Pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…LD is also frequently associated with hyponatremia, dry cough, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and markedly elevated C-reactive protein levels and platelet count. Although none of these features are specific for LD, Haubitz et al clearly demonstrated that in the absence of at least two of these factors, LD was excluded with 99 % accuracy [69].…”
Section: Legionella Pneumophilamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LD is also frequently associated with hyponatremia, dry cough, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and markedly elevated C-reactive protein levels and platelet count. Although none of these features are specific for LD, Haubitz et al clearly demonstrated that in the absence of at least two of these factors, LD was excluded with 99 % accuracy [69].…”
Section: Legionella Pneumophilamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of the pathogen by culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods has low sensitivity, and thus may not rule out bacterial infection [3]. For some types of infections, such as Legionella , clinical scores can help to assess the risk of infection [4, 5]. Several observational studies as well as interventional trials have established the usefulness of PCT in patients with respiratory infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data regarding diagnosis are quite limited, and only in the case of L pneumophila has an attempt been made to develop and validate a clinical decision rule that combines several signs and symptoms. 84 In general, individual signs and symptoms are of little value in the diagnosis of these atypical pathogens. Another approach would be to integrate signs and symptoms with a point-of-care test such as c-reactive protein (CRP), as has been done for pneumonia and influenza diagnosis.…”
Section: Evidence For Underdiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%