A possibility to characterize auditory perception of vehicle interior sounds is to ask the listener to rate the sound with respect to a specific sensation. Some sensations are familiar to all listeners, e.g., loudness as the psychoacoustic correlate of the physical property intensity. Other sensations either are not familiar to the non-expert listeners or may have different meanings to the listeners. The latter category includes the sensations of humming, rumbling and booming which are commonly associated with sounds that contain low-frequency tonal components. In the context of vehicle interior sounds, these were the topic of Doleschal et al. [1]. They familiarized the non-expert listeners to the sensations through an introduction phase where three sounds were presented to the listeners: an artificial prototypical sound that contained key features for the specific sensation, a recorded vehicle interior sound where the magnitude of the sensation was high and a third vehicle interior sound that did not elicit any of the three sensations. The present study investigates the benefit of such an introduction phase by comparing the results of non-expert listeners without an introduction phase to those with an introduction phase.