2013
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumen passage kinetics of forage- and concentrate-derived fiber in dairy cows

Abstract: Rumen passage kinetics of forage and concentrate fiber were analyzed to determine intrinsic feed effects and extrinsic ration effects on the retention time of fiber in the rumen. Sixteen Danish Holstein cows (557 ± 37 kg of body weight, 120 ± 21 d in milk, mean ± SD), 8 fitted with ruminal cannulas, were used in a completely randomized block experiment. Treatments differed in forage type (corn silage vs. grass silage) and forage:concentrate ratio (50:50 vs. 75:25 on organic matter basis). Fiber passage kinetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
15
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This tends to show that palm oil sludge is capable of suppressing methane production in vitro. Kramer et al (2013) reported that numerically longer retention time of grass silage-based rations (46.9 ± 5.68 h) compared with corn silage-based rations (36.9 ± 4.28 h) was in accordance with Lund (2002). The lag phase of 16 days implies that the inhibitory effect of the treatments might also be high if applied in vivo.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This tends to show that palm oil sludge is capable of suppressing methane production in vitro. Kramer et al (2013) reported that numerically longer retention time of grass silage-based rations (46.9 ± 5.68 h) compared with corn silage-based rations (36.9 ± 4.28 h) was in accordance with Lund (2002). The lag phase of 16 days implies that the inhibitory effect of the treatments might also be high if applied in vivo.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The period over which feces were collected may explain these low rates of particle recovery. Similar to other studies using plastic particles (King and Moore, 1957;Kaske et al, 1992) or concentrates with lactating cows (Mambrini and Peyraud, 1997;Zebeli et al, 2007;Krämer et al, 2013), our collection period lasted 106 h; however, a longer collection period might have increased the particle recovery rate. The longer periods reported in the literature (mean 8.3 d;Welch and Smith, 1978;Welch, 1982;DesBordes and Welch, 1984;Ehle and Stern, 1986;Murphy et al, 1989;Kaske and Engelhardt, 1990;Prigge et al, 1990;Clauss et al, 2011) did not facilitate complete recovery of particles of low or high density.…”
Section: Fecal Recovery Of Plastic Particles and Reliability Of The Msupporting
confidence: 60%
“…MRT DNDF , dietary maize proportion and rumen NDF digestibility) are interdependent as maize silage NDF usually has a lower rumen digestibility than grass silage NDF (Jensen et al, 2005;Brask et al, 2013a) and a different rumen MRT DNDF (Krämer et al, 2013). Furthermore, maize silage is rich in starch, whereas grass silage contains the more methanogenic CHO fibre and sugars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%