Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 1990
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-408-04150-8.50018-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumen Probiosis: The Effects of Novel Microorganisms on Rumen Fermentation and Ruminant Productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained in this experiment confirmed the finding of other authors that Yea-Sacc stimulates milk yield in cows (Dildey, 1988;Harris and Lobo, 1988;Williams, 1989;Harris and Webb, 1990;Williams and Newbold, 1990;Wallace and Newbold, 1992;Skorko-Sajko et al, 1993). One of the interesting results is that supplementing diets for cows with Saccharomyces carlsbergensis SK-1 affected not only milk production but also tended to increase protein and decrease fat content in milk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results obtained in this experiment confirmed the finding of other authors that Yea-Sacc stimulates milk yield in cows (Dildey, 1988;Harris and Lobo, 1988;Williams, 1989;Harris and Webb, 1990;Williams and Newbold, 1990;Wallace and Newbold, 1992;Skorko-Sajko et al, 1993). One of the interesting results is that supplementing diets for cows with Saccharomyces carlsbergensis SK-1 affected not only milk production but also tended to increase protein and decrease fat content in milk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The higher milk yield after supplementing diets with yeast preparations was probably caused by higher DM intake compared with the control group (Williams and Newbold, 1990;Wohlt et al, 1991). The advantageous effect of yeast preparation on milk production, which was marked during all periods of the experiment, could also be a result of a better established fermentation pattern in the rumen compared with that in control animals (Harrison et al, 1988;Adams et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These differences cannot be clearly attributed to the species and physiological state of animals or to diet composition. Our results suggest that live S. cerevisiae did not affect digestion in the rumen or that its effect was masked by greater hindgut fermentation in control rams as compared with animals fed live yeast (19). On the other hand, Moharrery and Asadi (16) showed that cellulase activity in the rumen was higher in lambs fed live yeast compared with animals on a control diet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…No differences were found between the total digestive tract digestibility of feed in control and experimental animals. This suggests that live cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae had no effect on the digestion processes in the rumen or that their influence was masked by greater hindgut fermentation in control -as compared with the experimental animals (Williams, 1989;Williams and Newbold, 1990). Due to this, total tract digestibility studies do not characterize the effect of the added yeast on the digestive processes in the rumen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%