2007
DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumination, negative cognition, and their interactive effects on depressed mood.

Abstract: Response styles theory posits that rumination represents a trait vulnerability to depression. Recent evidence has suggested that rumination predicts changes in depression more strongly among individuals with high levels of negative cognition. Three studies evaluated this model of interactive vulnerabilities. Study 1 provided empirical support for the distinction between rumination and negative cognitive content. The next 2 studies investigated the interactive model in the laboratory. Study 2 randomly assigned … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
184
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
14
184
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients are typically asked to recall emotionally triggering events and are then asked to identify, evaluate, and challenge distorted cognitions that occurred during the situation. Individuals who engage in high levels of ruminative coping may be more likely to process these situations in an immersed manner, promoting reliving of the experience and significantly enhancing the associated maladaptive cognitions and intensifying negative affect, making it more difficult to acquire new learning (Ciesla & Roberts, 2007;Kross, Ayduk, & Mischel, 2005). Thus it may take more time for these patients to learn to step back and focus on their experience without reactivating excessive negative affect and cognitive biases that interfere with the skills of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients are typically asked to recall emotionally triggering events and are then asked to identify, evaluate, and challenge distorted cognitions that occurred during the situation. Individuals who engage in high levels of ruminative coping may be more likely to process these situations in an immersed manner, promoting reliving of the experience and significantly enhancing the associated maladaptive cognitions and intensifying negative affect, making it more difficult to acquire new learning (Ciesla & Roberts, 2007;Kross, Ayduk, & Mischel, 2005). Thus it may take more time for these patients to learn to step back and focus on their experience without reactivating excessive negative affect and cognitive biases that interfere with the skills of CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its maladaptive nature can involve brooding and dwelling on the details of a past experience and regrets when focused on repeatedly (Saffrey & Ehrenberg, 2007). Research highlights rumination as a contributing factor to the experience of negative emotion, relationship problems such as lack of forgiveness, and depression (e.g., Ciesla & Roberts, 2007;Ysseldyk, Matheson, & Anisman, 2007). Carson and Cupach (2000) highlighted the role of rumination in the expression of romantic jealousy.…”
Section: Rumination As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding was significant as it implies that dysphoric people, who normally have both low self-esteem and DA, are more vulnerable to the effects of rumination as it increases their sensitivity to actual life events. The results supported previous findings that the interaction between negative feelings, rumination and actual negative life events is a robust effect, and could be replicated in laboratory environment (Ciesla & Roberts, 2007), has long term detrimental effects (Robinson & Alloy, 2003) and has a significant effect on the prognosis of an individual's depression treatment (Ciesla & Roberts, 2002). Secondly both reflective pondering and brooding were found to have an interactive effect with stress and negative contents.…”
Section: Unifying the Differential Activation Hypothesis Andsupporting
confidence: 88%