2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruminations and their correlates in depressive episodes: Between-group comparison in patients with unipolar or bipolar depression and healthy controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies comparing BD and MDD, the following comparisons became significant after the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis: (i) ‘ reflective pondering ’ subscale of the RRS, by removing the study (Aslan & Baldwin, 2021 ), (ii) ‘ putting into perspective ’ subscale of the CERQ, by removing the study (Wolkenstein, Zwick, Hautzinger, & Joormann, 2014 ), and (iii) ‘ goals ’ subscale of the DERS, by removing the study (Oymak Yenilmez et al, 2021 ), all passing from a small to a small-to-moderate effect size; (iv) ‘ awareness ’ subscale of the DERS, by removing the study (Musket, Hansen, Welker, Gilbert, & Gruber, 2021 ), passing from a small-to-moderate to a moderate effect size. On the contrary, by removing the studies ([Becerra et al, 2013 ], [Becerra, Bassett, & Harms, 2016 ], or [Weintraub, Van de Loo, Gitlin, & Miklowitz, 2017 ]) in the comparison relative to the ‘ clarity ’ subscale of the DERS, the overall effect became nonsignificant with an effect size comparable in magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies comparing BD and MDD, the following comparisons became significant after the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis: (i) ‘ reflective pondering ’ subscale of the RRS, by removing the study (Aslan & Baldwin, 2021 ), (ii) ‘ putting into perspective ’ subscale of the CERQ, by removing the study (Wolkenstein, Zwick, Hautzinger, & Joormann, 2014 ), and (iii) ‘ goals ’ subscale of the DERS, by removing the study (Oymak Yenilmez et al, 2021 ), all passing from a small to a small-to-moderate effect size; (iv) ‘ awareness ’ subscale of the DERS, by removing the study (Musket, Hansen, Welker, Gilbert, & Gruber, 2021 ), passing from a small-to-moderate to a moderate effect size. On the contrary, by removing the studies ([Becerra et al, 2013 ], [Becerra, Bassett, & Harms, 2016 ], or [Weintraub, Van de Loo, Gitlin, & Miklowitz, 2017 ]) in the comparison relative to the ‘ clarity ’ subscale of the DERS, the overall effect became nonsignificant with an effect size comparable in magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another noteworthy point is that even though the original scale was developed using a non-clinical sample, an increasing number of studies have utilized the ERQ to examine the specific impairment in emotion regulation within different mental disorders. [17][18][19][20] Recent studies using the ERQ include individuals with experience of trauma or posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, [21][22][23][24] eating disorders, 25,26 bipolar disorders, 27 social anxiety disorder, 28 and obsessive-compulsive disorder. 29 However, the psychometric properties of the ERQ in the clinical setting have not been fully verified yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 Individuals with depression have been found to excessively engage in these cognitive processes. 32 , 33 Hyperactivity of the DMN is linked to depressive symptomatology, including rumination 34 and disturbed self-referential processing. 35 In patients with TRD, studies have shown reduced FC between the CEN and DMN and between the anterior and posterior DMN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%