Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Internet Freedom: Censorship, Disinformation, and Propaga 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/d19-5008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rumor Detection on Social Media: Datasets, Methods and Opportunities

Abstract: Social media platforms have been used for information and news gathering, and they are very valuable in many applications. However, they also lead to the spreading of rumors and fake news. Many efforts have been taken to detect and debunk rumors on social media by analyzing their content and social context using machine learning techniques. This paper gives an overview of the recent studies in the rumor detection field. It provides a comprehensive list of datasets used for rumor detection, and reviews the impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have performed a case study of rumor diffusion on Twitter during a disaster rather than a general study of rumor diffusion. We are planning to apply the proposed method to another rumor dataset [43] and systematically investigate temporal patterns in topic diversity toward the development of a practical rumor detection algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have performed a case study of rumor diffusion on Twitter during a disaster rather than a general study of rumor diffusion. We are planning to apply the proposed method to another rumor dataset [43] and systematically investigate temporal patterns in topic diversity toward the development of a practical rumor detection algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, on account of time limits of Twitter API sometimes researchers focus on small data samples [8] or on biased data. For instance, most recent studies [16] on rumors detection focus only on tweets published in English and do not consider those disseminated in other languages which should be useful to improve the accuracy of detection. Thus, despite the important time required to collect the data and then analyze it certain works are not presented in conferences because the results of studies are too specific and can not be generalized.…”
Section: Consequences On Researchers Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying misinformation is a chief concern in infodemiology via infoveillance, not to mention in other areas of society like sociology and politics. Methods that use the probabilistic and lexical features of text in order to determine whether they represent misinformation (Li et al, 2019) abound. These methods depend on datasets that contain messages which have already been labelled misinformation by experts a priori.…”
Section: Value Of Misinformationmentioning
confidence: 99%