1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02482778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture

Abstract: The effectiveness of using an absorbable suture material for continuous closure of abdominal wounds, especially contaminated wounds, has not yet been determined. Thus, the present study was conducted to investigate the wound complications that developed following continuous closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using polydioxanone (PDS), compared with those that developed following interrupted closure using braided silk. Running closure using PDS was performed in 152 patients (PDS group), while 28… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Previous studies have reported that nonabsorption thread is a more frequent cause of suture granulomas than absorption thread. 11,12 Moreover, suture granulomas that develop following absorption thread suturing tend to heal after simple drainage within 1 week, whereas those that develop following nonabsorption thread suturing require a longer period of time to heal, necessitating removal of the infected suture materials. 11 Therefore, using absorption thread is beneficial for preventing unnecessary surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Previous studies have reported that nonabsorption thread is a more frequent cause of suture granulomas than absorption thread. 11,12 Moreover, suture granulomas that develop following absorption thread suturing tend to heal after simple drainage within 1 week, whereas those that develop following nonabsorption thread suturing require a longer period of time to heal, necessitating removal of the infected suture materials. 11 Therefore, using absorption thread is beneficial for preventing unnecessary surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported that absorption thread, including manufactured silk, can be a more frequent cause of suture granulomas than nonabsorption thread [9, 10]. Moreover, Iwase et al demonstrated that suture granulomas that develop following absorption thread suturing heal following simple percutaneous drainage within one week, whereas suture granulomas that develop following braided silk suturing require an average of 16 days to heal and necessitate the removal of the infected suture strings in all cases [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Iwase et al demonstrated that suture granulomas that develop following absorption thread suturing heal following simple percutaneous drainage within one week, whereas suture granulomas that develop following braided silk suturing require an average of 16 days to heal and necessitate the removal of the infected suture strings in all cases [9]. Absorption thread suturing rarely causes suture granulomas, and this type granuloma can be diagnosed and treated with simple drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 patients of gastric perforations including duodenal ulcer perforations and 19 cases of colorectal perforations were included by Iwase et a1. 4 Mean time taken for closure of rectus sheath in groups A&B was 13.10±2.998, and 16.00±2.15, minutes respectively. The difference being statistically highly significant (p<0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%