1952
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.5.4.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Running of Standards in Clinical Chemistry and the Use of the Control Chart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, based on the assessment number of Z-scores (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,16,18, and 20; Fig. 1 and Table 1) [5].…”
Section: Establishment Of Decision Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, based on the assessment number of Z-scores (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,14,16,18, and 20; Fig. 1 and Table 1) [5].…”
Section: Establishment Of Decision Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two representative methods used to identify systematic errors in a clinical laboratory are the Levey-Jennings chart [1,2] and the Westgard multirule chart [3]. These 2 quality control (QC) procedures are 1 fundamentally limited, in that the test results from the QC materials are interpreted with eight semi-quantitative sections, including the following: less than -3 standard deviations (SDs), -3 SD to -2 SD, -2 SD to -1 SD, -1 SD to mean, mean to +1 SD, +1 SD to +2 SD, +2 SD to +3 SD, and over +3 SDs [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original chart used by Levey and Jennings was a Shewhart chart on which was plotted the mean of duplicate measurements of a patient sample [ 8 ]. The use of duplicate measurements of quality control was subsequently modified a couple of years later to a single measurement of quality control material, and " single measurement " statistical quality control has become the industry standard [ 9 ].…”
Section: Quality Control and Statistical Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many things remain to be improved, statistical quality control procedures have significantly enhanced analytical performances since they were first introduced in clinical laboratories in the late 1950s. Method validation studies and application of quality control samples have considerably reduced the error rates of the analytical phase (Levey, 1950;Henry RJ, 1952). A simple technique that we can use in our laboratories is to translate the method validation results into sigma metrics (Westgard, 2006a;Westgard, 2006b).…”
Section: Sigma Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%