2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runoff and soil loss from Pinus massoniana forest in southern China after simulated rainfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 2c, the FTS soil had a larger sediment yield rate than the CS soil did although the former (FTS soil) had a lower runoff rate. Our result is in contradiction with previous studies (Giménez and Govers, 2008;Cao et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). The previous studies indicated that a larger runoff rate could carry a greater amount of sediments.…”
Section: Runoff and Deposition Processes Under Fts And Cscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2c, the FTS soil had a larger sediment yield rate than the CS soil did although the former (FTS soil) had a lower runoff rate. Our result is in contradiction with previous studies (Giménez and Govers, 2008;Cao et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). The previous studies indicated that a larger runoff rate could carry a greater amount of sediments.…”
Section: Runoff and Deposition Processes Under Fts And Cscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific studies have shown that raindrops reach the soil surface with a high kinetic energy in uniform forest areas, due to the coalescence of raindrops along the canopy (Cao et al ., 2015). These results highlight the importance of litter and of the maintenance of crop residues in planted forest areas (Geißleret al, 2012, Cao et al, 2015.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Runoff significantly (α = 0.05) increased with increase in slope steepness during all rainfall intensities in un-mulched soil. However, an increase in slope steepness from 5 • to 15 • had a non-significant effect on runoff under the rainfall intensities of 120 mm·h −1 , because during higher rainfall intensities, the time required for runoff generation was too short to reflect the difference between slopes [32]. Whereas, the same slope steepness (increase from 5 • to 15 • ) with a rainfall intensity of 94 mm·h −1 had a significant effect on runoff.…”
Section: Surface Runoffmentioning
confidence: 93%