2008
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runoff generation mechanisms in pastures of the Sand Mountain region of Alabama—a field investigation

Abstract: Abstract:Excessive application of poultry litter to pastures in the Sand Mountain region of north Alabama has resulted in phosphorus (P) contamination of surface water bodies and buildup of P in soils of this region. Since surface runoff is recognized as the primary mechanism of P transport, understanding surface runoff generation mechanisms are crucial for alleviating water quality problems in this region. Identification of surface runoff generation mechanisms is also important for delineation of hydrological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Events were spread out throughout the year (Figure 2). As presented in Sen et al (2008), very few rainfall events generated surface runoff at this study site.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Events were spread out throughout the year (Figure 2). As presented in Sen et al (2008), very few rainfall events generated surface runoff at this study site.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is clear that site and watershed hydrology exert an overwhelming effect on whether agricultural P will become a downstream water quality concern (Gburek et al 2002;Pionke et al 2000). Within watersheds, variable source area hydrology (Hewlett and Hibbert 1967) can produce severe spatial heterogeneity in the potential for P to be transferred from field to water body (Sen et al 2008;Srinivasan and McDowell 2009;Walter et al 2000). Watersheds prone to variable source area hydrology possess zones that contribute disproportionately to runoff (e.g., Pionke et al 1997), with the size and location of runoffgenerating areas determined by the interaction of soil moisture, topography and geomorphology (Buda 2011;Needleman et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some differences between UH and UR and their derivations are summarized as follows: (i) UH in hydrology, used in the runoff-routing process, transforms the areal excess rainfall to a direct runoff (the difference between total runoff and baseflow) process at a specific cross section, viz, the outlet of a watershed; however, for GHGs, it is expected to estimate the average areal excess GHG emission process from excess manure application. (ii) The excess rainfall can be estimated by certain runoff-generation mechanisms (Latron and Gallart, 2008;Sen et al, 2008) before UH is used for flow routing, but it is not easy to determine the excess (effective) nitrogen/carbon for N 2 O, CO 2 , and CH 4 emissions. (iii) Long-term continuous runoff data are available for many watersheds, but GHG flux data are available only if a specific experiment is implemented.…”
Section: Implications Of Unit Response and Its Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%