2017 International Conference on Cloud and Autonomic Computing (ICCAC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccac.2017.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runtime Modifications of Spark Data Processing Pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the dynamic implementation of each scenario takes longer to run than the static Spark implementation. This matches the results of the earlier experiments done for spark-dynamic (Lazovik et al, 2017). The reason for this is that we have added extra functionality on top of the existing static Spark code.…”
Section: Runtime Overheadsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First, the dynamic implementation of each scenario takes longer to run than the static Spark implementation. This matches the results of the earlier experiments done for spark-dynamic (Lazovik et al, 2017). The reason for this is that we have added extra functionality on top of the existing static Spark code.…”
Section: Runtime Overheadsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In a previous work done by the authors (Lazovik et al, 2017), we have investigated the feasibility of dynamically updating the processing pipeline of an Apache Spark application. Apache Spark is one of the most popular big data processing platforms.…”
Section: Spark-dynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations