2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16612-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runtime Verification

Abstract: Until recently, there was not a strong need for networking inside aircrafts. Indeed, the communications were mainly cabled and handled by etherned protocols. The evolution of avionics embedded systems and the number of integrated functions in civilian aircrafts has changed the situation. Indeed, those functionalities implies a huge increase in the quantity of data exchanged and thus in the number of connections between functions. Among the available mechanisms provided to handle this new complexity, one find A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Runtime verification (RV) (or monitoring) [9,2] is a well-established technique to check whether the current execution of a program satisfies a property of interest. In the last years, RV has increasingly gained popularity in both the formal verification and software engineering communities, because in most of the cases it reveals to be more practical than exhaustive verification techniques such as model checking [5,12] and more versatile than classical software testing.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Runtime verification (RV) (or monitoring) [9,2] is a well-established technique to check whether the current execution of a program satisfies a property of interest. In the last years, RV has increasingly gained popularity in both the formal verification and software engineering communities, because in most of the cases it reveals to be more practical than exhaustive verification techniques such as model checking [5,12] and more versatile than classical software testing.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%