2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijwgs.2013.055699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Runtime verification of service-oriented systems: a well-rounded survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embedded system and service-based system are the top two application domains. Another survey comprehensively discuss the runtime verification for service-oriented systems in five categories: the logic and calculus oriented approaches, runtime workflow monitoring, state-based conformity assessment, aspect-oriented verification and SLA-driven compliance [ 180 ]. For each solution, the authors introduced the framework from eight selected characteristics, which include monitor, monitoring process, formal specification language, development language, monitoring data, realization mechanism, properties of interest and service composition.…”
Section: The Safety Of Self-adaptation Strategies and The Dependabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedded system and service-based system are the top two application domains. Another survey comprehensively discuss the runtime verification for service-oriented systems in five categories: the logic and calculus oriented approaches, runtime workflow monitoring, state-based conformity assessment, aspect-oriented verification and SLA-driven compliance [ 180 ]. For each solution, the authors introduced the framework from eight selected characteristics, which include monitor, monitoring process, formal specification language, development language, monitoring data, realization mechanism, properties of interest and service composition.…”
Section: The Safety Of Self-adaptation Strategies and The Dependabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At design-time, the method ensures that the desirable requirements can be achieved without the system execution, whereas runtime verification concentrates on the service composition behavior when it is on-the fly [3].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the desirable behavioral properties that must be satisfied by service composition during its execution are defined in the formal language (2). Once collected, our approach takes responsibility by the conformity process of checking behavioral properties according to execution trace (3). When an undesirable property is detected, the simplest action would be sending a message to the user.…”
Section: Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%