Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rupture Pressure Prediction for Composite High Pressure Tanks Using Acoustic Emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This announces the global breakdown. It is interesting that the exponent 1/2 is close to the value found for acoustic emissions in experiments [2,9,11,12].…”
Section: Beyond the Mean Field Version By Functional Renormalizationsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This announces the global breakdown. It is interesting that the exponent 1/2 is close to the value found for acoustic emissions in experiments [2,9,11,12].…”
Section: Beyond the Mean Field Version By Functional Renormalizationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Based on analogies with phase transitions, several groups [2]- [12] have proposed that, in heterogeneous materials with disorder such as fiber composites, rocks, concrete under compression and materials with large distributed residual stresses, rupture is a genuine critical point, i.e., the culmination of a self-organization of diffuse damage and micro-cracking characterized by power law signatures. Experiments [2,7,9,11,12], numerical simulations [5,6,8,10] and theory [8] confirm this concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3: Post-diction using the (H, q)-analysis on the cumulative energy release of tanks # 1, # 2, # 3, # 4 and # 6. Columnsp (1) c andp (2) c list the predicted critical pressurep c and its corresponding upper threshold in the parenthesis with the constraint (16) for k = 4/3 and k = 1 respectively. The meaning of the other columns are the same as in Table 1.…”
Section: Post-diction Of Rupturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The columnsp (1) c andp (2) c list the predicted critical pressurep c and its corresponding upper threshold in the parenthesis with the constraint (16) for the two choices k = 4/3 and k = 1 respectively. The prediction for experiment # 1 is very good.…”
Section: Post-diction Of Rupturesmentioning
confidence: 99%