1968
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1968.tb02941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruptured Caesarean Section Scar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by several studies [37][38][39]. The reasons given for opposition to caesarean section include denial of womanhood, fear of scorn from other women, and the risk of dying from the procedure.It is therefore necessary to educate the people on the role caesarean section plays as an alternative to hazardous vaginal delivery, and to critically examine caesarean delivery and suggest alternative measures where feasible [30] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This is supported by several studies [37][38][39]. The reasons given for opposition to caesarean section include denial of womanhood, fear of scorn from other women, and the risk of dying from the procedure.It is therefore necessary to educate the people on the role caesarean section plays as an alternative to hazardous vaginal delivery, and to critically examine caesarean delivery and suggest alternative measures where feasible [30] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The safest way of managing subsequent delivery when the primary indication for caesarean section in the previous pregnancy is non-recurring, remains a contested question. Views range from contemplating vaginal delivery in virtually all patients (McCarry 1969;Saldana et al 1979) to almost always advising elective repeat caesarean section (Cragin 1904;Lawson & Ajabor 1968;Case et al 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two patients in the present series, scar rupture was suspected but not confirmed. The risk of lower segment scar dehiscence is of the greatest concern and does not diminish with each subsequent vaginal delivery (Lawson & Ajabor 1968;Case et al 1971). The frequency of schr rupture during labour varies but in most series the range is between 0.3 and 3.8% (Dewhurst 1957;Peel & Chamberlain 1968;McGarry 1969;Saldana et al 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,14,20. The commonest surgical treatment in this study was repair of the uterus alone, followed by a hysterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%