1989
DOI: 10.2307/422319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Development Areas in Swaziland: The Politics of Integrated Rural Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has similarities and differences with the integrated rural development (IRD) approach of the 1970s and 1980s. The main similarities are simultaneous, complementary interventions, which create synergies and a major initial focus on agricultural productivity, including agroprocessing (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has similarities and differences with the integrated rural development (IRD) approach of the 1970s and 1980s. The main similarities are simultaneous, complementary interventions, which create synergies and a major initial focus on agricultural productivity, including agroprocessing (18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There remains a danger that NGOs could be employed instrumentally in order to attain and legitimize top‐down, anti‐democratic policy outcomes (Lewis 2002; Lane 2003). In affording Swazi NGOs greater interaction with policy and implementation processes, this will inevitably lead to the decentralization of power (Sallinger‐McBride and Picard 1989). However, in the current political context, whether this can actually occur in the near future, with real authority being delegated to local citizens and new institutions becoming downwardly accountable, remains uncertain, since the promotion of active participation will begin from very different baseline conditions than in the west (Mohan 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be direct and indirect conflicts of interest and development priorities among various stakeholders. The political contradictions inherent in these multisectoral approaches may make IRD more difficult to implement and sustain than single-sectoral projects (Sallinger-McBride and Picard, 1989)[3].…”
Section: Background and Overview Of Irdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. See for instance the Swaziland’s rural development areas (Sallinger-McBride and Picard, 1989) and the intensive development zones IRD program in Zambia (Fenichel and Smith, 1992). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation