2012
DOI: 10.1080/01296612.2012.11689936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Rural Informatics’: Use of Information and Communication Technologies for the Rural Poor – From Digital Divide to Digital Opportunity in Rural India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the current state of the digital economy does not effectively enhance household resilience. Our result contradicts the findings of some scholars such as Kumar (2012), Adera et al (2014), andCai et al (2023), highlighting the hidden issue of the 'digital divide' behind the development of the digital economy (Philip and Williams 2019;Marshall et al 2020;Peng and Dan 2023). Despite the rapid development of China's digital infrastructure and network terminal devices, the coverage and accessibility of the digital economy have greatly improved.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the current state of the digital economy does not effectively enhance household resilience. Our result contradicts the findings of some scholars such as Kumar (2012), Adera et al (2014), andCai et al (2023), highlighting the hidden issue of the 'digital divide' behind the development of the digital economy (Philip and Williams 2019;Marshall et al 2020;Peng and Dan 2023). Despite the rapid development of China's digital infrastructure and network terminal devices, the coverage and accessibility of the digital economy have greatly improved.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, digital divide policies are difficult to implement in rural areas due to the lack of community participation (Kumar 2012) or other unintended externalities, such as deprivation of human resources in rural communities (LaRose et al 2008) or benefiting non-agricultural sectors rather than the target area (Flor 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%