2015
DOI: 10.1093/jae/eju035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Policies, Price Change and Poverty in Tanzania: An Agricultural Household Model-Based Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large majority of rural households are primarily engaged in agricultural activities, either working their own land or as hired laborers on someone else's land. 7 Also, as found in Tanzania (Tiberti and Tiberti 2015) and several other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, because of high transaction costs and heterogeneity across workers and households, the labor market is imperfect or absent (e.g., see the examples reported in de Janvry and Sadoulet 2006). In such a context, engagement in the selling or purchasing of a good in an imperfect market might be unprofitable for households and for this reason, production and consumption decisions are interconnected.…”
Section: Figure 1 Definition Of School Work and Rainfall Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large majority of rural households are primarily engaged in agricultural activities, either working their own land or as hired laborers on someone else's land. 7 Also, as found in Tanzania (Tiberti and Tiberti 2015) and several other countries in sub-Saharan Africa, because of high transaction costs and heterogeneity across workers and households, the labor market is imperfect or absent (e.g., see the examples reported in de Janvry and Sadoulet 2006). In such a context, engagement in the selling or purchasing of a good in an imperfect market might be unprofitable for households and for this reason, production and consumption decisions are interconnected.…”
Section: Figure 1 Definition Of School Work and Rainfall Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the agricultural production, the inputs of labor and arable land have significantly positive impacts on the outputs. The educational level of the household head has a significant effect on farm production, supporting the widely accepted role of human capital in improving agricultural production (Henning and Henningsen, 2007;Tiberti and Tiberti, 2015). In addition, households located in mountainous areas produce more agricultural products than those from hilly areas.…”
Section: Variable Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Here, we assume that the households in our study region are clearly price taker and profit maximizing and competitive producers. A two-stage estimation strategy developed on the basis of previous literature (Henning and Henningsen, 2007;Tiberti and Tiberti, 2015) is adopted. We firstly estimate the shadow wage of household labor through modeling the intra-household production system and then include the estimated shadow wage in a multioutput profit function to investigate the relationship between agricultural production and biomass collection.…”
Section: Rptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies have assessed other technologies or farm management. These technologies include mechanization by animal traction in Tanzania (Tiberti and Tiberti, 2015) and Burkina-Faso (Sanfo and Gérard, 2012), and by tractor in Nigeria; the provision of seasonal climate forecasts to farmers by Bharwani et al (2005) in South Africa and Ziervogel et al, (2005) in Lesotho; and the assessment of transport infrastructure and non-selective grazing system in Kenya and South Africa, respectively (Omamo, 1998, Beukes et al, 2002).…”
Section: Figure 13: Number Of Studies Per Group Of Technologies and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies predicted that mechanization technologies with tractor and animal traction increase farmer income and productivity. Tiberti and Tiberti (2015) showed that a hypothetical 10% increase in the use of oxen-ploughs in Tanzania would reduce the incidence of poverty by 7% and the poverty gap by 8%. A similar result has been predicted by a case study in Burkina-Faso.…”
Section: Innovations Related To Mechanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%