1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1994.tb00227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Primary Care Program Survival: An Analysis of Financial Variables

Abstract: This study examines the effect of financial characteristics of rural primary care programs on the probability of their continuing as federally funded entities. A randomly selected national cohort of rural primary care programs (n = 162) was used to compare financial measures of programs that were continuing and those that were noncontinuing. Financial data were obtained from 1978-1987 Bureau Common Reporting Requirements (BCRR) forms submitted to the Bureau of Health Care Delivery and Assistance of the Departm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the measures were directly available from the UDS. The financial measures of stability, efficiency, and productivity were created based on industry standards, prior research, and our experience (Feldman, Dietz, & Brooks, 1978;Mullner, 1990;Mullner, Rydman, Whiteis, & Rich, 1989;Rosenblatt & Moscovice, 1982;Shi et al, 1994;Walleck & Kretz, 1981).…”
Section: Center Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the measures were directly available from the UDS. The financial measures of stability, efficiency, and productivity were created based on industry standards, prior research, and our experience (Feldman, Dietz, & Brooks, 1978;Mullner, 1990;Mullner, Rydman, Whiteis, & Rich, 1989;Rosenblatt & Moscovice, 1982;Shi et al, 1994;Walleck & Kretz, 1981).…”
Section: Center Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for closer examination of the total financing support of the C/MHCs in order to develop comprehensive federal and state policies. (Shi, et al, 1994). From a policy perspective, government intervention is both necessary and likely if rural C/MHCs are to succeed and fulfill their mission of providing primary care for the medically underserved who are primarily poor, uninsured, and unable to pay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%