2013
DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural Science Education: Valuing Local Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
128
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These are among the most underrepresented students in advanced STEM study and careers (Avery, 2013;Eick et al, 2007;Suresh, 2011) and the least likely to possess the mathematics confidence that motivates sustained engagement, persistence, and learning in the discipline (Perez, Cromley, & Kaplan, 2014;Singh, Granville, & Dika, 2002). Yet close to half the students indicated that they believed they learned during the tutoring session, a quarter identified a specific learning outcome, and some made detailed comments directly expressing their own increased confidence in their ability to understand and learn math.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are among the most underrepresented students in advanced STEM study and careers (Avery, 2013;Eick et al, 2007;Suresh, 2011) and the least likely to possess the mathematics confidence that motivates sustained engagement, persistence, and learning in the discipline (Perez, Cromley, & Kaplan, 2014;Singh, Granville, & Dika, 2002). Yet close to half the students indicated that they believed they learned during the tutoring session, a quarter identified a specific learning outcome, and some made detailed comments directly expressing their own increased confidence in their ability to understand and learn math.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller (1995), Theobald, and Curtiss (2000), and Avery (2013) provide examples of where the community becomes a part of the curriculum, with students becoming involved in community needs assessments, studying and monitoring environment and land use patterns, or documenting local history through interviews. Similarly, we can include intergenerational learning projects, local environmental knowledge, and intercultural learning that help to establish understanding of other generations, cultures, and local connections and interactions.…”
Section: Discussion: Possibilities For Thickening Conceptions Of Needmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might mean that in the rural elementary education environment a more "closed" learning context is "less closed" than its urban secondary and tertiary education counterparts. This hypothesis aligns with the fact that due to some specific conditions of rural schools (i.e., fewer students; multigrade classes; insertion in natural environment) rural education can involve a more significant and close teacher-student connection (Ballou & Podgursky, 1995;Hardré, 2007) along with the use of teaching practices such as peer tutoring, cooperative learning, interdisciplinary studies and multigrade teaching, as well as teaching externally to the school (Khattri et al, 1997) and exploring the surroundings as a learning resource (Avery, 2013;Stern, 1994cit. Khattri et al, 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But then, the fact that these schools often have fewer students might promote establishment of a more significant and close teacher-student connection (Ballou & Podgursky, 1995;Hardré, 2007), which may influence positive motivation for learning (Hardré, Sullivan & Crowson, 2009). Some studies also indicate that, due to its specific characteristics, the rural school seems to promote "open" teaching practices (Hamon & Weeks, 2002), such as peer tutoring, cooperative learning, interdisciplinary studies and multigrade teaching, besides teaching outside the school (Khattri et al, 1997) and exploring the environment as a learning resource (Avery, 2013;Stern, 1994cit. Khattri et al, 1997.…”
Section: The Relationship Of Learning Context With Students' Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%