2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-016-1457-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural-to-urban Migration and Rising Evaluation Standards for Subjective Social Status in Contemporary China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, scholars have begun to pay attention to the differences in subjective class identification. In the past, the subjects of the study have mainly been urban residents and migrant workers, and these studies have mainly explored the impact of a series of factors, such as life experience, administrative level, the father's professional reputation, and housing consumption, on class identification (Zhao and Ge, 2014 ; Wang, 2017 ; Rubin and Stuart, 2018 ; Reeves, 2019 ; Lee et al, 2020 ). Regarding the focus of the research, which is advocacy related to pursuing equality between men and women, the current research object is mainly female groups, the analysis of which may improve to a certain degree of research significance the understanding of the class identity of female groups (Bolzendahl and Myers, 2004 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now, scholars have begun to pay attention to the differences in subjective class identification. In the past, the subjects of the study have mainly been urban residents and migrant workers, and these studies have mainly explored the impact of a series of factors, such as life experience, administrative level, the father's professional reputation, and housing consumption, on class identification (Zhao and Ge, 2014 ; Wang, 2017 ; Rubin and Stuart, 2018 ; Reeves, 2019 ; Lee et al, 2020 ). Regarding the focus of the research, which is advocacy related to pursuing equality between men and women, the current research object is mainly female groups, the analysis of which may improve to a certain degree of research significance the understanding of the class identity of female groups (Bolzendahl and Myers, 2004 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is reflected in a series of female groups comprising rural women. The investigation and research reveals that rural women's class identification comes more from their own working conditions, the education level of their mothers and themselves, and the participation of the community, as well as the interpersonal communication with the people inside and outside the village (Michelson, 2007 ; Wang, 2017 ). Therefore, we can define the following as factors that affect women's class identification: gender consciousness, intergenerational influence of mothers, lifestyle, and spouse status.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anchoring vignettes can therefore be used to adjust subjective measures by purging reporting heterogeneity from the self-assessed measures, making the adjusted self-assessment better comparable across individuals. Anchoring vignettes have been used in many research areas such as health [ 47 54 ], healthcare [ 55 , 56 ], subjective well-being and quality of life [ 46 , 57 – 60 ], political efficacy [ 45 , 61 ], job satisfaction [ 62 ], working disability [ 63 ] and social status [ 64 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anchoring vignettes have been included in many social surveys including the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the WHO Study on Global Aging and Adult Health (SAGE) and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to name but a new. The methodology of anchoring vignettes, has been used for a broad range of interpersonal comparisons with regard to health [ 3 , 8 14 ], healthcare [ 15 , 16 ], political efficacy [ 1 , 17 , 18 ], life satisfaction [ 19 22 ], job satisfaction [ 23 ], working disability [ 2 ], social status [ 24 ], poverty [ 22 ] and quality of life [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%