2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural versus nonrural differences in BMC, volumetric BMD, and bone size: a population-based cross-sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
49
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with previous studies by Specker et al (2004) who found strength as an explaining factor in bone structural differences between rural and non-rural people with comparable body size and with MacDonald et al (2006) who saw a significant effect of muscle cross-sectional area on bone bending and compressive strength indexes in pre-pubertal boys and girls when body size was accounted for by bone length. In our study variables of muscular force production, muscle volume, specific tension and activation level (Fukunaga et al 2001) were used in the regression model to explain bone strength.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in line with previous studies by Specker et al (2004) who found strength as an explaining factor in bone structural differences between rural and non-rural people with comparable body size and with MacDonald et al (2006) who saw a significant effect of muscle cross-sectional area on bone bending and compressive strength indexes in pre-pubertal boys and girls when body size was accounted for by bone length. In our study variables of muscular force production, muscle volume, specific tension and activation level (Fukunaga et al 2001) were used in the regression model to explain bone strength.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…From these parameters the specific tension came out as a new predictor variable in addition to the other variables, which have been previously shown to be importantly involved in muscle-bone interplay (Blain et al 2001;Calbet et al 1999;Calmels et al 1995;Ducher et al 2005;Macdonald et al 2006;Nordstrom et al 1996;Pettersson et al 1999;Pettersson et al 2000;Ribom et al 2004;Sandstrom et al 2000;Specker et al 2004;Taaffe and Marcus 2004). The results thus further support the suggestion that appropriate neuromuscular loading is related to bone strength (Burr 1997;Ferretti et al 2003;Frost 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend, small though it may be, may represent changes in lifestyle over the past 3 generations in this area of the midwestern United States. With a shift from rural to urban life and changes in physical activity and nutrition of young children, we may expect to see a slight change in childhood bone mass [60], which may eventually affect patterns of bone mass in adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The South Dakota Rural Bone Health Study is a 7.5-year population-based longitudinal study of three distinct populations distinguished by lifestyle (Hutterite, rural nonHutterite [NH], nonrural NH) [13]. Both the Hutterite and rural NH populations live a similar rural farming lifestyle, but their social structure is significantly different (Hutterites have a religion-based communal lifestyle).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be considered nonrural the participant could never have lived on a working farm. Methods for recruiting and enrolling participants are described in greater detail elsewhere [13]. Of the 1271 participants, 585 (226 males) were Hutterite, 350 (184 males) were rural NH, and 336 (134 males) had never lived on an active farm (nonrural).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%