2016
DOI: 10.24216/97723645330050202_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russia’s Arlington? The Federal Military Memorial Cemetery near Moscow

Abstract: Ordering Information:PRINT: Subscription (two copies per year): € 58.00 / year (+ S&H: € 4.00 / year within Germany, € 7.00 / year international). The subscription can be canceled at any time.Single copy or back issue: € 34.00 / copy (+ S&H: € 2.00 within Germany, € 3.50 international).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originating in a period in which states needed to consolidate themselves as communities (Anderson 1991) and forge a unitary national identity, archetypal architectural collective memory was mainly expressed through material commemoration in the form of "tangible, monolithic, recognizable, permanent, literally carved in stone" (Olick 2013:89). Unique historical emphasis was thus given to national and physical characteristics of official commemoration sites in public spaces, among them street names (Azaryahu 1996(Azaryahu , 2021Pinchevski and Torgovnik 2002), museums (Katriel 1997;Klein 2020;Noy 2015;Tinsley 2019), historical parks (Loughran et al 2018), and cemeteries (Azaryahu 1995;Gabowitsch 2016;Guttel 2017;McElya 2016;Ozouf 1998), not to mention monuments, statues, and memorials that commemorate historical figures and events that were considered most important to the nation (Ben-Amos 1993Minta 2009).…”
Section: Materials Commemoration: the Past Within The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Originating in a period in which states needed to consolidate themselves as communities (Anderson 1991) and forge a unitary national identity, archetypal architectural collective memory was mainly expressed through material commemoration in the form of "tangible, monolithic, recognizable, permanent, literally carved in stone" (Olick 2013:89). Unique historical emphasis was thus given to national and physical characteristics of official commemoration sites in public spaces, among them street names (Azaryahu 1996(Azaryahu , 2021Pinchevski and Torgovnik 2002), museums (Katriel 1997;Klein 2020;Noy 2015;Tinsley 2019), historical parks (Loughran et al 2018), and cemeteries (Azaryahu 1995;Gabowitsch 2016;Guttel 2017;McElya 2016;Ozouf 1998), not to mention monuments, statues, and memorials that commemorate historical figures and events that were considered most important to the nation (Ben-Amos 1993Minta 2009).…”
Section: Materials Commemoration: the Past Within The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unique historical emphasis was thus given to national and physical characteristics of official commemoration sites in public spaces, among them street names (Azaryahu 1996, 2021; Pinchevski and Torgovnik 2002), museums (Katriel 1997; Klein 2020; Noy 2015; Tinsley 2019), historical parks (Loughran et al. 2018), and cemeteries (Azaryahu 1995; Gabowitsch 2016; Guttel 2017; McElya 2016; Ozouf 1998), not to mention monuments, statues, and memorials that commemorate historical figures and events that were considered most important to the nation (Ben‐Amos 1993, 2000; Minta 2009).…”
Section: Materials Commemoration: the Past Within The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%