2015
DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2015.1026689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russia's flat tax reform: redefining its effects on employment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the effect of the flat tax system has received attention through empirical works from several scholars (Evans and Aligica, 2008). To reinforce this, Kryvoruchko (2015) analysed the effect of a flat tax on employment in Russia, whereas, in Bulgaria, Vasilev (2015) observed the effect of welfare gains by comparing flat tax and progressive tax. However in Ghana, according to the income tax act 2015 (Act 896), all taxable income is progressive.…”
Section: Taxation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the effect of the flat tax system has received attention through empirical works from several scholars (Evans and Aligica, 2008). To reinforce this, Kryvoruchko (2015) analysed the effect of a flat tax on employment in Russia, whereas, in Bulgaria, Vasilev (2015) observed the effect of welfare gains by comparing flat tax and progressive tax. However in Ghana, according to the income tax act 2015 (Act 896), all taxable income is progressive.…”
Section: Taxation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of this literature has honed in on the particular politics of initial flat tax adoption (Appel, 2011(Appel, : 84-115, 2018Appel and Orenstein, 2013;Baturo and Gray, 2009;Beblavý, 2014;Evans and Aligica, 2008;Todor, 2018), failing to address the ebb and flow of tax system changes prior to or following the adoption of flat tax schedules. Yet, despite the virtual absence of studies assessing the distributional and fiscal implications of the 'flat tax revolution' (Appel, 2011: 86) in these parts (for exceptions, see Ivanova et al, 2005;Keen et al, 2006;Kryvoruchko, 2015;Vasilev, 2015;Voinea and Mihȃescu, 2009), flat tax adoption has been dubbed revolutionary, bold, radical (Appel, 2011(Appel, , 2018Appel and Orenstein, 2013;Baturo and Gray, 2009;Keen et al, 2006;Mitchell, 2007).…”
Section: Tax Systems In Post-socialist Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to hoped-for outcomes, in their assessment of eight flat tax regimes, Keen et al (2006: 13) found that, in the short-run, government revenue from PIT declinedrather than increasedas a result of the flat tax in the majority of cases: Russia and Lithuania, with a notable short-term increase in revenue (Ivanova et al, 2005;Keen et al, 2006;Kryvoruchko, 2015), seem to have been outliers. Furthermore, there is no systematic empirical evidence supporting a desirable impact on either labour supply, shifts in income from corporate to personal income, the broadening of the tax base or greater tax compliance in any of the country analyses available.…”
Section: Tax Systems In Post-socialist Europementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Kryvoruchko, I. (2015) [26] examines the employment effect of replacing progressive tax rates with a flat tax rate in the 2001 tax reform in Russia. Kryvoruchko classifies employment into primary and secondary and official and unofficial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%