Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions

Shadrina, Elena

doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.025

Cited by 25 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Russia's advancements over the years have been very haphazard for several reasons, among which the global economic crisis, technical difficulties in developing these East Siberian fields, and lengthy negotiation processes (Fernández and Palazuelos, 2011;Henderson and Stern, 2014). Still, with subsequent energy strategies, Russia has become more positive about the share of gas that will be exported to East Asia, reaching over 30% by 2035 (Shadrina, 2014). Paltsev (2014) has confirmed the feasibility of this scenario using a modelling approach.…”

Section: For Details)mentioning

confidence: 65%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Economic impacts of natural gas flow disruptions between Russia and the EU

Bouwmeester

Oosterhaven

2017

Energy Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we use a non-linear programming approach to predict the wider interregional and interindustry impacts of natural gas flow disruptions. In the short run, economic actors attempt to continue their business-asusual and follow established trade patters as closely as possible. In the model this is modelled by minimizing the information gain between the original pattern of economic transactions and the situation in which natural gas flows are disrupted. We analyze four scenarios that simulate Russian export stops of natural gas by means of a model calibrated on an international input-output table with six sectors and six regions.The simulations show that at the lower levels of aggregation considerable effects are found. At the aggregate level of the whole economy, however, the impacts of the four scenarios are negligible for Europe and only a little less so for Russia itself. Interestingly, the effects on the size of the economy, as measured by its GDP, are predominantly positive for the various European regions, but negative for Russia. The effects on the welfare of the populations involved, however, as measured by the size of domestic final demand, have an opposite sign; with predominantly negligible but negative effects for European regions, and very small positive effects for the Russian population.

show abstract

Section: For Details)mentioning

confidence: 65%

“…On the other hand, Russia is also actively pursuing strategies to diversify away from Europe and to generate gas export revenues elsewhere (Dickel et al, 2014;Shadrina, 2014). The focus is currently on developing gas fields in East Siberia for East Asian markets.…”

Section: For Details)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic impacts of natural gas flow disruptions between Russia and the EU

Bouwmeester

Oosterhaven

2017

Energy Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…China purchases oil and gas from Russia and both sides reached an agreement in 2008. The Chinese government have multi-dimensional cooperation with Russia and both countries have stronger defence cooperation (Bradshaw, 2014;Røseth, 2017Røseth, , 2019Shadrina, 2014). Paul Schwartz (2017) states that China and Russia have had deeper defence cooperation.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

China-Russia Bilateral Security and Military Partnership in Changing World Order: Security Challenges for the United States of America in Asia and Beyond

Bharti

2022

HiP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this research is to assess the defence partnership of Russia and China after the Cold War period. This study analyses the military cooperation and strategic relation of Russia and China in the post-Cold War period. Further, the article highlights the main contradicting areas between the United States of America (USA) and the Russia-China alliance in international politics. It also elucidates the Russia-China relationship across the diplomatic paradigm and economic aspects in the global economic system. China’s flagship economic New Silk Road Initiative is a challenging concept for the US on land and maritime across the world. Thus, the study uses the research question: how do China and Russia compete with the US challenges in the new world order? The qualitative comparative method is used to investigate answers to the research questions and objectives of this study. This article attempts to use an analytical framework to describe the countries’ vision for joint development in the area of security issues. Russia and China have deep military cooperation and commit to working together against the US domination in the Asia Pacific and other parts of the world. In a conclusion it is stated that Russia and China have been accelerating bilateral military cooperation in a positive direction, which is a success story between both countries, and the US is facing stiff competition in Asia as well as in the Asia Pacific Region (APR).

show abstract

“…Pour la Chine comme pour la Russie, la gestion de la sécurité énergétique ne peut se concevoir en dehors de l'Etat, notamment au travers de la mise en oeuvre d'une diplomatie énergétique. A l'opposé du multilatéralisme promu par l'UE, les relations bilatérales entre Etats et entre companies sont dès lors privilégiées (Shadrina, 2014b ;Vivoda, 2014). Les contrats de long terme adossés à des financements, les politiques de descente en aval ou d'accès à la ressource des companies énergétiques, sont partie prenante de cette logique.…”

Section: La Question Des Structures De Gouvernanceunclassified

L es échanges gaziers entre la R ussie et la C hine à l’ aune de leur sécurité énergétique

Locatelli¹

2015

Revue D’études Comparatives Est-Ouest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

L’accord signé entre la compagnie russe Gazprom et la compagnie chinoise CNPC en mai 2014 relatif à l’exportation de 38 Gm3/an pendant 30 ans de gaz russe vers la Chine marque un tournant dans la politique énergétique de la Russie comme dans celle de la Chine. Signé par deux pays structurants des marchés mondiaux d’hydrocarbures, sa portée peut s’avérer stratégique. Pour les deux parties, ces échanges gaziers s’inscrivent dans une stratégie de diversification qui vise à répondre à des préoccupations de sécurité énergétique dans ses deux dimensions d’offre et de demande. Ils répondent en premier lieu à des préoccupations d’ordre économique. Cependant, le développement des échanges gaziers entre la Russie et la Chine s’inscrit dans un contexte institutionnel particulier marqué par une convergence des structures de gouvernance des industries gazières.

show abstract

Russia׳s natural gas policy toward Northeast Asia: Rationales, objectives and institutions

Cited by 25 publications

References 3 publications

Economic impacts of natural gas flow disruptions between Russia and the EU

Economic impacts of natural gas flow disruptions between Russia and the EU

China-Russia Bilateral Security and Military Partnership in Changing World Order: Security Challenges for the United States of America in Asia and Beyond

L es échanges gaziers entre la R ussie et la C hine à l’ aune de leur sécurité énergétique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About