2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-022-03390-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russian climate scepticism: an understudied case

Abstract: In this paper, we consider climate scepticism in the Russian context. We are interested in whether this has been discussed within the social scientific literature and ask first whether there is a discernible climate sceptical discourse in Russia. We find that there is very little literature directly on this topic in either English or Russian and we seek to synthesise related literature to fill the gap. Secondly, we consider whether Russian climate scepticism has been shaped by the same factors as in the USA, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AC used to limit institutionally (at least to some extent) Russia's Arctic agenda, balancing its priorities of economic benefits (exploitation of natural resources) by imposing some values, norms, and policies against climate change. This trend used to spread well beyond exclusively Arctic gover-nance confronting so-called "climate skepticism" of Russian political elite (e.g., Ashe and Poberezhskaya 2022). Such issues as the rights of the indigenous population have now lost meaning for Russian policy-makers at both subnational and national level.…”
Section: Nation-statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AC used to limit institutionally (at least to some extent) Russia's Arctic agenda, balancing its priorities of economic benefits (exploitation of natural resources) by imposing some values, norms, and policies against climate change. This trend used to spread well beyond exclusively Arctic gover-nance confronting so-called "climate skepticism" of Russian political elite (e.g., Ashe and Poberezhskaya 2022). Such issues as the rights of the indigenous population have now lost meaning for Russian policy-makers at both subnational and national level.…”
Section: Nation-statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon has been the object of extensive empirical research since the 1980s, along with its determinants at the individual and contextual levels (Brügger et al, 2021 ; Douenne & Fabre, 2020 ; Knight, 2016 ; Lee et al, 2015 ; Nauges et al, 2021 ; Nistor, 2022 ; Poortinga et al, 2019 ; Zhou, 2015 ). Its counterforce, climate denial or skepticism, have also received scientific attention (Ashe & Poberezhskaya, 2022 ; Capstick et al, 2015 ; Whitmarsh, 2011 ).…”
Section: Climate Change Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change is one of the main challenges that humankind is facing today (International Panel on Climate Change, 2018 ; United Nations Environment Programme, 2021 ). Although the scientific community, followed by significant sectors of society, widely agrees on its existence and its anthropogenic roots, this phenomenon is still denied by many people around the world (Ashe & Poberezhskaya, 2022 ; Fagan & Huang, 2019 ; McCright & Dunlap, 2011 ; Weintrobe, 2013 ). Interestingly, this situation overlaps with the ongoing heated debate as to whether social network site usage merely produces slacktivism (Smith et al, 2019 ) and reinforces environmental skepticism (Dunlap, 2013 ), or if it helps to promote acknowledgement of the problem in creative ways (Parham, 2016 ) and fosters green citizenship (Anderson, 2017 ; Boykoff, 2020 ; Gil de Zúñiga et al, 2012 ; Lindgren, 2015 ; Rotman et al, 2011 ; Takahashi et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Russians regularly cite environmental pollution as a main problem facing the country, they are relatively unconcerned about climate change and do not see it as an urgent government priority (Ashe & Poberezhskaya, 2022; Kurbanov & Prokhoda, 2019). Russian citizens largely agree with Russian policymakers that foreign policy interests and conspiracy drive international climate diplomacy more than environmental concerns (Korppoo, 2020).…”
Section: Climate Change Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%