2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1028335819010051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russian Hydropower under the Global Climate Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our recent study [ 16] the precipitation change in Russia in our baseline scenario is estimated as increasing at 5-10% relative to the modern averages. The model simulations forecast more humid climate in the eastern part of the country and in the North-West of European part (up to 10% increase in the annual precipitation), less pronounced changes in the central regions (5-10%) and minor changes (or even some aridification) in the southern regions of European part.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our recent study [ 16] the precipitation change in Russia in our baseline scenario is estimated as increasing at 5-10% relative to the modern averages. The model simulations forecast more humid climate in the eastern part of the country and in the North-West of European part (up to 10% increase in the annual precipitation), less pronounced changes in the central regions (5-10%) and minor changes (or even some aridification) in the southern regions of European part.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, in general, assuming the same areas of wood harvest, the total national wood production is expected to rise in 2050 by some 30% compared to the recent decades due to an elevated net primary production of forests. Consequently, due to persistent and anticipated climatic changes the available primary energy wood resources by mid-century would increase by more than 9 Mtce that considerably exceeds the climatic impacts on other sectors of energy production -both negative for thermal and nuclear power plants (due to expected reduction of thermal cycle efficiency, which will result in additional fuel consumption of 4.3 Mtce/year [ 19]), and positive for hydropower generation (probable growth up to 4%, or 7-8 TWh/year, which is equivalent to the reduction of fossil fuel consumption by 2.5 Mtce/year [ 16,19]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%