Russian Mentality And European Identity. The Linguistic Aspect Of The Problem

Volkov, Vladislav; Volkova, N. V.; Gladilina, I.V.

doi:10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.240

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

(1 reference statement)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Language material, which contains the names of professions in which Russian Philology students can work, is extracted by the authors from scientific (including popular science [1]) and business texts, as well as from data on employment, on those areas of professional activity of Philology students that are directly or indirectly related to their higher philological education. Based on the analysis of the material already used by the authors of the method [2], it was placed the distinction between nuclear and peripheral parts of the field, the main research methodcognitive reconstruction of the field through the establishment denotative-referential -"real life" relations of concepts "language" and "profession" (the sphere of professional activities).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Problems of Professional Education of Russian Philology Students

Гладилина¹,

Волков²,

Volkova³

2021

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the work is to construct algorithms for professional reflection and choice of profession of philological profile for students-specialists in Russian Philology. The language materialthe names of professions in which students can work is extracted from the texts of business and journalistic speech, the analysis is based on the differentiation of the nuclear and peripheral parts of the field under consideration. The research is carried out at the intersection of pedagogy, linguistic semantics, labor psychology and linguoculturology. It is based on the linguistic technology of constructing semantic fields in combination with linguocognitive analysis. The results showed that the list of "professions for philologists" and their systematization should be based on the following grounds: 1) "universal" philological professions that are in demand in all institutional spheres of society; 2) "specialized" philological professions that are important mainly for the media, education, and culture. The practical value of the obtained results lies in the possibility of using them for professional education of students-specialists in Russian Philology in order to organize professional reflection and achieve a meaningful choice of the field of professional activity.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%