Russian nuclear energy diplomacy and its implications for energy security in the context of the war in Ukraine

Abstract

Since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the possibility of reducing Europe’s energy dependence on Russian resources has been hotly debated. The fossil fuel industries received most attention as European Union leaders first introduced gradual sanctions on Russian coal and later on oil and gas, while Russia responded with supply cuts. However, Russia’s role as a major player in the global nuclear power sector has remained largely below the sanctions radar, despite dependencies on Russian nuclear technology, uranium supplies and handling of spent nuclear fuel. Here we analyse the state nuclear company Rosatom and its subsidiaries as tools of Russian energy statecraft. We map the company’s global portfolio, then categorize countries where Russia is active according to the degree and intensity of dependence. We offer a taxonomy of long-term energy dependencies, highlighting specific security risks associated with each of them. We conclude that the war and Russia’s actions in the energy sector will undermine Rosatom’s position in Europe and damage its reputation as a reliable supplier, but its global standing may remain strong.

Post-pandemic lessons for EU energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Introduction to a special issue on EU green recovery in the post-Covid-19 period

“…However, the EU energy crisis connected to the Russian invasion of Ukraine is still unveiling, as are the EU's responses to the attack. Russian natural gas has yet to be sanctioned by the EU, as does the nuclear sector, although Russian nuclear fuel and technology play a very important role in the EU's energy sector ( Szulecki and Overland, 2023 ). To overcome the energy crisis following February 2022, the EU has found new crucial energy partners (especially the USA) and strengthened cooperation with existing ones (for example, Norway).…”

Russian aggression against Ukraine and the changes in European Union countries’ macroeconomic situation: Do energy intensity and energy dependence matter?

“…its affordability. The invasion intensified concerns about the accessibility of fossil fuels with mounting apprehension that Russia might leverage control over supply and costs to force political compromises and counter Western economic sanctions (Szulecki & Overland, 2023;Van de Graaf & Colgan, 2017).…”

National Security as a Value-Added Proposition for Advanced Nuclear Reactors: A U.S. Focus

“…If nuclear power was solely a carbon emissions and global climate issue, lagging behind Russia and China in nuclear deployment may not necessarily be a priority concern for the U.S. as deploying more zero-carbon nuclear power would forego future carbon emissions. However, as anticipated by early U.S. civilian nuclear power policymakers, a relative advantage in nuclear technology translates to a relative advantage in global influence-an advantage and influence that Russia and China are competing to gain through civilian nuclear collaboration with other countries [103,[131][132][133][134][135]. Such competition between great powers is inherent throughout history, and it should not be met with panic.…”