Russian Politics in Exile

Patrikeeff, Felix

doi:10.1057/9780230535787

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Речь шла о людях, переехавших в Маньчжурию или родившихся там до Октябрьской революции и не испытывавших враждебных чувств к советскому режиму. В этом они кардинально отличались от «классических» белоэмигрантов, которые перебрались в Китай после 1917 г., «проголосовав ногами» против большевистской власти 40 . Приказ Иванова, с одной стороны, настроил против советской власти и ее представителей тех эмигрантов, которые до этого относились к ним как минимум нейтрально, а с другой -расколол эмигрантское общество в Харбине, создав в нем новые точки напряженности 41 .…”

unclassified

Chinese Eastern Railway and Russian Minority Groups in Manchuria

Vul¹

2021

Modern History of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The history of the Chinese Eastern Railway (CER) railway, which has drawn the attention of scholars almost since the time of its construction, is inseparable from the story of the complicated and tangled relations between one majority group — Chinese — and two large minority groups, White émigrés and Soviet citizens who resided in Manchuria and whose lives were largely related to the CER. These relations are largely ignored by the scholars of the CER, in which the focus is on various diplomatic aspects and the CER is considered to be a key actor in international relations of the countries and whose interests were related to Manchuria. Therefore, this article explores the complicated and tangled relations between Chinese, White émigrés, and Soviet citizens who resided in Manchuria in 1920s — 1930s and whose lives were largely related to the Chinese Eastern Railway. This very aspect, the existence of two minority groups (CER’s soviet staff and White émigrés) who shared the same linguistic, cultural, and ethnic background, but who, on the other hand, were political antagonists, makes the Manchurian case especially unique and interesting. This paper argues that common ethnic identity prevailed over ideological discord. This discord was neutralized by life which they lived together surrounded by culturally, linguistically, and ethnically different majority.

show abstract

unclassified

Chinese Eastern Railway and Russian Minority Groups in Manchuria

Vul¹

2021

Modern History of Russia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Harbin in comparative perspective

Gamsa

2010

Urban History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:This article argues that historians have largely neglected the dimension of Chinese–Russian interaction, which was central to the development of Harbin from the emergence of this city in 1898 as an outpost of imperial Russia in Manchuria (north-east China). It goes on to propose a new approach to Harbin history, which, integrating its ‘Russian’ and ‘Chinese’ histories during the period prior to the Japanese occupation of Manchuria in 1932, would also place it in a wider comparative context. This comparative approach is illustrated in the article by a consideration of the issue of ethnically segregated living quarters.

show abstract

Continuities and Evolution in Russian Perceptions of East Asia

Rangsimaporn

2009

Russia as an Aspiring Great Power in East Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Russian Politics in Exile

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Chinese Eastern Railway and Russian Minority Groups in Manchuria

Chinese Eastern Railway and Russian Minority Groups in Manchuria

Harbin in comparative perspective

Continuities and Evolution in Russian Perceptions of East Asia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About