2019
DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2019-38-45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Russian translation and validation of SarQoL® – quality of life questionnaire for patients with sarcopenia

Abstract: The aim is to carry out language adaptation and validation on the Russian sample of a special SarQoL questionnaire, designed to assess the quality of life of elderly people with sarcopenia. Material and methods. 100 patients over 65 years, mean age 74.0±6.5 years, observed on an outpatient basis were included. 50 from them had sarcopenia and 50 participants were without it. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on criteria developed by the European working group on sarcopenia (EWGSOP, 2010). The validation pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scoring algorithm is not publicly available, but tools to calculate the scores are available by contacting info@sarqol.org. The clinimetric properties of the questionnaire have been evaluated in 11 different languagespecific versions, and considerable information is available for known-groups validity, construct validity, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change, and an evaluation of the responsiveness of the SarQoL has also been carried out [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Based on these results, the SarQoL is considered to be a valid, reliable and responsive instrument.…”
Section: Development Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scoring algorithm is not publicly available, but tools to calculate the scores are available by contacting info@sarqol.org. The clinimetric properties of the questionnaire have been evaluated in 11 different languagespecific versions, and considerable information is available for known-groups validity, construct validity, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, test-retest reliability, standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change, and an evaluation of the responsiveness of the SarQoL has also been carried out [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Based on these results, the SarQoL is considered to be a valid, reliable and responsive instrument.…”
Section: Development Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinimetric properties of the SarQoL questionnaire have been examined for 11 language-specific versions of the questionnaire and has demonstrated strong measurement properties [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The questionnaire has been extensively translated, and is available in 30 languages from the website www.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was initially developed and validated in French in 2015 5,6) and was later translated and validated into English, Dutch, Romanian, Polish, Hungarian, Russian, and Greek. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] To provide the Ukrainian nation with a qualitative and reliable questionnaire to measure the quality of life of sarcopenic patients, we have created the Ukrainian version of the SarQoL questionnaire. The process of translation and validation followed the protocol for translation provided by the authors of the SarQoL questionnaire, which were based on the recommendations of Beaton et al 14) This protocol included translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of psychometric properties of the questionnaire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire is self‐reported and takes about 15 min to complete. The SarQoL questionnaire has been validated in multiple languages and has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument 13,15–19,33 . The questionnaire was shown to be responsive to changes in QoL in a sample of 42 sarcopenic subjects followed over 3 years, and its standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change have been calculated in different European populations as well as pooled 20,21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%