“…Each reduction was performed using four different ruthenium based catalysts IeIV, see Scheme 1. R = CH 3 (1,13), CH 2 F (2, 14),CHF 2 (3,15), CF 3 (4,16), Et (5,17), i-Pr (6,18), t-Bu (7,19) In order to reveal how structural variations affected the enantioselectivity, regression analysis was performed using the difference in Gibbs free energy for the reactions leading to the two enantiomers, D(DG), calculated from the ee-values and substituent constants. 28 The substituent constant evaluated includes parameters for size of groups: Taft's Es (Es), Charton volume (ESÀV), inductive parameters: s-para, s-para À , s-para þ , resonance: resonance effect (R), resonance delocalisation of negative charge (R À ), resonance delocalisation of positive charge (R þ ), group dipole, hydrophobicity, group electronegativity and molar refractivity.…”