2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c01909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium-Catalyzed Meta-Selective C-H Difluoromethylation of Phenol Derivatives

Abstract: With pyrimidine as the directing group, we achieved the meta-selective difluoromethylation of phenol derivatives using ruthenium as a catalyst. This synthetic scheme provided an efficient method for the syntheses of fluorine-containing phenol derivatives. A wide variety of phenol derivatives were well-suited, affording the corresponding products in moderate-to-good yields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to typical secondary alkyl halides, the reaction with protected 2-bromoazetidine delivered the ortho-alkylated product. Very recently, further investigations of meta-C-H alkylations were carried out with arenes bearing different directing groups, such as aryl 2-pyridyl ketones 66 (Scheme 21a), 32 2-phenoxypyridines 42a (Scheme 21b), 33 and 2phenoxypyrimidines 70 (Scheme 21c) 34 at high reaction temperatures of 100-150 °C. In addition to strong N-directing groups, 2-biphenylphosphines 72 were employed as substrates in ruthenium-catalyzed meta-C-H transformation, as was reported by the group of Li (Scheme 21d).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to typical secondary alkyl halides, the reaction with protected 2-bromoazetidine delivered the ortho-alkylated product. Very recently, further investigations of meta-C-H alkylations were carried out with arenes bearing different directing groups, such as aryl 2-pyridyl ketones 66 (Scheme 21a), 32 2-phenoxypyridines 42a (Scheme 21b), 33 and 2phenoxypyrimidines 70 (Scheme 21c) 34 at high reaction temperatures of 100-150 °C. In addition to strong N-directing groups, 2-biphenylphosphines 72 were employed as substrates in ruthenium-catalyzed meta-C-H transformation, as was reported by the group of Li (Scheme 21d).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition-metal-catalyzed meta -C Ar –H functionalization has been intensively developed in recent years, and four main strategies have been investigated: (a) the steric regiocontrol mode typically realized by Hartwig; (b) the template directing group elegantly designed by Yu, Maiti, and others; (c) the palladium/norbornene cooperative catalysis pattern mainly developed by Yu, Dong, Lautens, and others; and (d) the ruthenium-catalyzed C–H functionalization via σ-activation strategy established by Ackermann, Frost, and others. σ-Activation benefits from the ortho -ruthenation strategy, such as a series of C–H sulfonation, alkylation, halogenation, benzylation, nitration, acetylation, and others, have been developed through the development of a free radical or electrophilic reagent (Scheme a). Most recently, Ackermann and Greaney developed a novel photoinduced ruthenium-catalyzed meta -selective C–H alkylation at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20 examples presented in Scheme highlight the synthesis of chiral salicylaldehyde imines with two meta -substituents ( R 2 and R 1 ) composed of aryl, alkyl, and trifluoromethyl substituents. Two meta -substitutions are particularly noteworthy given the natural bias of phenols toward substitutions at ortho - and para -positions making meta -substitutions very challenging, which has inspired innovative approaches in recent years. Yields for the asymmetric amino-Cope step range from good to excellent (1st yield in parentheses) with yields for the DDQ driven aromatization step similarly successful (2nd yield in parentheses). Crystal structure analysis for bis-trifluoromethyl substituted product 10 afforded unambiguous confirmation of structure (CCDC 1451255).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product was purified with a gradient of 5−15% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel, giving 10 as a white solid from General Procedure A (54.4 mg, 0.1244 mmol, 85%): 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 12.04 (s, 1H), 8.72 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 1.26 (s, 9H); 13 C NMR{ 1 H} (125 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 163. 2, 161.2, 145.4, 140.8, 135.4, 130.0, 125.8, 123.8, 126.2, 117.8, 117.6, 114.6, 58.3, 22.2; 19 (S,E)-N-((4″-Bromo-5′-hydroxy-[1,1′:3′,1″-terphenyl]-4′yl)methylene)-2-methylpropane-2-sulfinamide (11). Product was purified with a gradient of 5−15% EtOAc in hexanes on silica gel, giving 11 as a white solid and from General Procedure A (53.2 mg, 0.1165 mmol, 89%): 1 8, 161.5, 147.1, 145.4, 139.3, 137.4, 131.85, 131.3, 129.0, 128.7, 127.2, 122.8, 120.5, 115.0, 114.6, 57.9, 22.3;FT-IR (NaCl film) 3062, 3033, 2961, 2927, 2866, 1593, 1175 (12).…”
Section: ■ Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%