Dedicated to Professor Jack D. Dunitz on the occasion of his 80th birthday An experimental comparison of the gas-phase reactivity of the 14-electron reactive intermediates produced by phosphine dissociation from the first-and second-generation ruthenium metathesis catalysts, (L)Cl 2 RuCHR (L PCy 3 or NHC), supports Grubbs×s contention that the second-generation catalysts show hundred-fold higher phenomenological activity despite a slower phosphine dissociation because of a much more-favorable partitioning of the 14-electron active species towards product-forming steps. The gas-phase study finds, in ring-opening metathesis of norbornene as well as acyclic metathesis of ethyl vinyl ether, that the first-generation systems display evidence for a higher barrier above that for phosphine dissociation; the secondgeneration systems, on the other hand, behave as if there is no significantly higher barrier.Introduction. ± The discovery, and progressive refinement and improvement of olefin-metathesis catalysts [1] makes an understanding of the mechanistic basis for the novel reaction of considerable theoretical as well as practical interest. The groundbreaking discovery of the versatile (PCy 3 ) 2 Cl 2 RuCHPh metathesis catalyst by Grubbs and co-workers [2], and others [3], and the subsequent discovery of the −second-generation× catalysts by Grubbs and co-workers [4], Nolan and co-workers [5], and Herrmann and co-workers [6], in which an N-hetereocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand replaces one phosphine in the first-generation systems, has spurred synthesis of even more varied structural variants [7 ± 9] as well as extensive mechanistic work. Recently, Grubbs and co-workers have presented an extensive in situ NMR study [10] in which it was concluded that the origin of the greatly increased activity in the second-generation catalysts derived from a more-favorable branching ratio for the competition in which the active carbene complex, (L)Cl 2 RuCHR (L PCy 3 or NHC), partitions between entry into the catalytic cycle and rebinding of a phosphine. At about the same time, we reported a gas-phase study [11] comparing the reactivity of a cationized first-generation active species, (PRCy 2 ) 2 Cl 2 RuCHÀCHCMe 2 , to that of the activated forms of the Ru-based catalysts from Hofmann and co-workers [7], and Werner and co-workers [8]. The gas-phase experiments led to the conclusion that the higher activity in solutionphase ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of cyclooctene for catalysts from the latter two groups, compared to that of the first-generation Grubbs systems, accrued from a more-favorable (reversible) activation step ± a better pre-equilibrium. The insights that gas-phase intrinsic reactivity studies on the first-generation Grubbs, Hofmann, and Werner carbene complexes brought for the solution-phase ROMP reactions suggest that a study comparing the first-and second-generation Grubbs carbene complexes could be fruitful, especially in conjunction with the Grubbs×s kinetic