“…These dyes overcome the efficiency of BD tested in the same conditions ( η = 10.05 vs 9.07% ; TiO 2 : 18 + 4 μm, dye: 0.3 mM DMF / t -butanol 1:1 with 10 mM DCA, electrolyte: 0.6 M DMPII, 0.1 M I 2 , 0.1 M LiI, 0.5 M t-bupy in CH 3 CN) due to their higher molar extinction coefficients between 400 and 550 nm and their extended absorption up to 850 nm, as a consequence of the HOMO destabilization by the pyrazole. The same group reported, in 2011 [128], a series of tridentate 2,6-bis(3-pyrazolyl)pyridine ligands bearing various substitutions in 4- position ( 33 , Figure 26). The reported IPCE spectra showed a worse sensitization in the NIR region with respect to N749 but a better conversion in the visible range which accounts for efficiencies up to 10.7% (TiO 2 : 15 + 5 μm, dye: 0.3 mM ethanol / DMSO 4:1 with 1M CDCA, electrolyte: 0.6 M DMPII, 0.1 M I 2 , 0.5 M t-bupy, 0.1 M LiI in CH 3 CN).…”