2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium isotopic fractionation in primitive achondrites: Clues to the early stages of planetesimal melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, determining the potential Ni stable isotope difference between ureilites and chondrites could shed light on the core formation effect on Ni isotope fractionation, and further constrain the terrestrial core formation (Klaver et al., 2020). A similar approach using ureilites had been taken to study the effect of core formation on highly siderophile elements (Creech, Baker, Handler, et al., 2017; Creech, Moynier, & Bizzarro, 2017; Hopp & Kleine, 2021). Additionally, the size of UPB is smaller than Earth (Nabiei et al., 2018; Nestola et al., 2020; Schiller et al., 2018), and the effect of isotope fractionation during core formation for the UPB should be larger than that of the Earth due to higher temperature in the core‐mantle boundary of larger bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, determining the potential Ni stable isotope difference between ureilites and chondrites could shed light on the core formation effect on Ni isotope fractionation, and further constrain the terrestrial core formation (Klaver et al., 2020). A similar approach using ureilites had been taken to study the effect of core formation on highly siderophile elements (Creech, Baker, Handler, et al., 2017; Creech, Moynier, & Bizzarro, 2017; Hopp & Kleine, 2021). Additionally, the size of UPB is smaller than Earth (Nabiei et al., 2018; Nestola et al., 2020; Schiller et al., 2018), and the effect of isotope fractionation during core formation for the UPB should be larger than that of the Earth due to higher temperature in the core‐mantle boundary of larger bodies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of S-rich Fe-Ni-S melts cannot easily explain the observed Ru isotopic fractionation with reasonable degrees of melt extraction. However, the extraction of S-poor metallic melts at higher temperatures can produce the heavier δ 102/99 Ru values of primitive achondrites with realistic degrees of melt extraction(Hopp and Kleine, 2021). Thus, the results from the S-rich experiments reported here are likely not directly applicable to the main driver of isotopic fractionation in primitive achondrites, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Nevertheless, they provide evidence for variable extraction of S-rich and S-poor Fe-Ni-S melts (Day et al, 2012;Goodrich et al, 2013;Dhaliwal et al, 2017;Day et al, 2019). Hopp and Kleine (2021)…”
Section: Implications For Ru Isotope Fractionation In Natural Fe-fes Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acapulcoites and lodranites may record processes of early metal and low-fraction (< 2-7%) silicate melt loss (Mittlefehldt et al 1996;Dhaliwal et al 2019). As noted by Hopp and Kleine (2021), complex patterns of S-poor and S-rich metallic veins, heterogeneous distribution of FeNi metal, and HSE systematics in several primitive achondrite groups indicate successive segregation and redistribution of both S-rich and S-free metallic liquids prior to silicate melting, and a complex series of differentiation processes. Wang et al (2014) suggested that ungrouped feldspar-rich achondrites represent products of low-degree silicate melting, with Fe isotope systematics inferred to represent an earlier period of at least localised FeS-rich liquid accumulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%