2019
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ruthenium Picolinate Complex as a Redox Photosensitizer With Wide-Band Absorption

Abstract: Ruthenium(II) picolinate complex, [Ru(dmb) 2 (pic)] + ( Ru(pic) ; dmb = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine; Hpic = picolinic acid) was newly synthesized as a potential redox photosensitizer with a wider wavelength range of visible-light absorption compared with [Ru(N ∧ N) 3 ] 2+ (N ∧ N = diimine ligand), which is the most widely used redox photosensitizer. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electronic absorption spectra of the compounds within the Ru‐ip‐ n T series (Figure 2a) are characterized by IL transitions localized to the dmb and phen portion of the ip ligand below 300 nm as well as a broad metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT) band in the 420–550 nm range, consistent with the spectrum of the parent [Ru(dmb) 3 ] 2+ complex [14,15] . An additional band centered near 370 nm is visible in Ru‐ip‐2T that shifts to longer wavelengths in Ru‐ip‐3T and Ru‐ip‐4T .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The electronic absorption spectra of the compounds within the Ru‐ip‐ n T series (Figure 2a) are characterized by IL transitions localized to the dmb and phen portion of the ip ligand below 300 nm as well as a broad metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT) band in the 420–550 nm range, consistent with the spectrum of the parent [Ru(dmb) 3 ] 2+ complex [14,15] . An additional band centered near 370 nm is visible in Ru‐ip‐2T that shifts to longer wavelengths in Ru‐ip‐3T and Ru‐ip‐4T .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 59%
“…S1a and S1c, † respectively. In the case of PyrRu, one reversible and one irreversible oxidation wave were observed at E ox 1/2 ¼ 0.86 V and E ox p ¼ 1.19 V vs. Ag/AgNO 3 , respectively; the former was attributed to the one-electron oxidation of the central Ru(II) to Ru(III), as that of [Ru(dmb 47 and the latter was attributed to the oxidation of pyrrole groups. On the other hand, the cyclic voltammogram of Pyr2Ru featured only one broad large oxidation wave at E ox p ¼ 1.00 V, which was attributed to the combination of Ru(II) / Ru(III) oxidation and pyrrole group oxidation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1b and S1d †). 47 A NiO nanoparticle-modied transparent uorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) electrode was prepared by the previously reported squeeze method 9,10 and used as the working electrode for the oxidative electropolymerization (induced by 25 or 50 potential sweeps between E ¼ 0 and +1.35 V vs. Ag/AgNO 3 ) of Ru(II) complexes with pyrrole groups. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%