2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-016-0342-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ryan White CARE Act and Collaborative Governance Re-Examined: the South Florida Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The opportunity that collaborative governance provides to engage stakeholders from public, private and nonprofit/civic sectors to collectively work together to address a common problem makes it very appealing (Emerson & Nabatchi, 2015;Gray, 1989). For instance, the use of collaborative governance by HIV Health Services Planning Councils in Eligible Metropolitan Areas (EMAs) in the U.S. is a viable strategy for care and treatment of target populations (Agbodzakey, 2017). The viability of collaborative governance as a framework for collective problem solving thereby demands some conceptual explication to help relate to its core elements from theory, policy and practical perspectives.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The opportunity that collaborative governance provides to engage stakeholders from public, private and nonprofit/civic sectors to collectively work together to address a common problem makes it very appealing (Emerson & Nabatchi, 2015;Gray, 1989). For instance, the use of collaborative governance by HIV Health Services Planning Councils in Eligible Metropolitan Areas (EMAs) in the U.S. is a viable strategy for care and treatment of target populations (Agbodzakey, 2017). The viability of collaborative governance as a framework for collective problem solving thereby demands some conceptual explication to help relate to its core elements from theory, policy and practical perspectives.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notable benefits of collaborative governance as enumerated by scholars include collective resolve and responsibility to tackle common challenges, creative and sustainable solutions to problems, achieve economies of scale, collective resource pool to promote effectiveness, jointly structured design protocols of engagement, regular joint capacity development efforts for collective action, responsive representation and participation of relevant community and organizational stakeholders, promotion of deliberative decision making, communication, shared understanding, consensus, and legitimacy among stakeholders, and joint ownership of outputs and/or outcomes for the common good (Ansell & Gash, 2008;Emerson et al, 2012;Bryson et al, 2015;Scott & Thomas, 2017;Sabatier et al, 2005;Choi & Robertson 2014;Sirianni 2009;Agbodzakey, 2012;Susskind & Cruikshank, 1987;McGuire, 2006;Donahue & Zeckhauser, 2011;Bel & Warner, 2008 among others). On the other hand, observations regarding notable challenges of collaborative governance include the following: power differentiation and utilization, time and other resource constraints, turf battles, intentional holdout by some stakeholders, uncertain outcomes, occasional conflicts and ambiguity, delayed decisions, and succession challenges (Memon & Kirk 2010;Hageman & Bogue 1998;Scott & Thomas, 2017;Agbodzakey, 2015;Metze & Levelt 2012;Sabatier et al, 2005;Margerum, 2011;Emerson et al 2012;Booher, 2004;Berardo, Heikkila, & Gerlak 2014;Vangen & Huxham 2012).…”
Section: Conceptualizing Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations