2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S. aureus IgG-binding proteins SpA and Sbi: Host specificity and mechanisms of immune complex formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
103
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, Burman and colleagues showed that Sbi is extracellular, and they suggested that cell surface-bound Sbi might be disadvantageous for the bacterium due to its role in modulating the complement system (8). On the other hand, cell surface localization of Sbi would be appropriate for interference with the adaptive immune system through IgG binding (3). Irrespective of these previously reported findings, our Western blotting analyses show that Sbi is noncovalently bound to the cell wall, not only in S. aureus SH1000 and S. aureus RN4220 but also in S. aureus Newman.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Nevertheless, Burman and colleagues showed that Sbi is extracellular, and they suggested that cell surface-bound Sbi might be disadvantageous for the bacterium due to its role in modulating the complement system (8). On the other hand, cell surface localization of Sbi would be appropriate for interference with the adaptive immune system through IgG binding (3). Irrespective of these previously reported findings, our Western blotting analyses show that Sbi is noncovalently bound to the cell wall, not only in S. aureus SH1000 and S. aureus RN4220 but also in S. aureus Newman.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Most bacterial immunoglobulin-binding proteins exhibit little or no sequence homology and are generally considered to have converged during evolution to bind overlapping sites in the interdomain region, with the observed diversity in immunoglobulin-binding profiles with respect to isotype, subclass and species being accounted for by the different binding interactions (Frick et al, 1992;Goward et al, 1993;Pleass et al, 2001). The best studied IgG-binding proteins are protein A and protein G. Protein G and protein G-like proteins are responsible for much of the IgG binding by group C and group G streptococci (Björck et al, 1987;Navarre & Schneewind, 1999), whereas IgG binding by Staphylococcus aureus is mediated by protein A and/or Sbi, a protein A-like protein (Atkins et al, 2008;Moks et al, 1986;Uhlén et al, 1984). In S. pyogenes, immunoglobulin binding is mediated by three groups of M proteins encoded by the emm, mrp and enn genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cell wall-anchored protein A and secreted protein Sbi share many of the same characteristics, targeting IgG from a number of different species and subclass types predominantly at the Fc domain (45,46). SSL10 appears to favor the upper Cg2 domain, whereas the CH2/CH3 interface serves as the primary target for a number of unrelated Ig binding proteins across many different bacterial species (19,22,39,43,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%