Variable Stars and Stellar Evolution 1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-9934-9_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S Dor-Type Variables in Other Galaxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The historical light curve of Var B was described, among others by Hubble & Sandage (1953), Rosino & Bianchini (1973), and Sharov (1973, 1975. The star underwent ample secular light variation between ∼17 and ∼14.5 (photographic magnitudes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The historical light curve of Var B was described, among others by Hubble & Sandage (1953), Rosino & Bianchini (1973), and Sharov (1973, 1975. The star underwent ample secular light variation between ∼17 and ∼14.5 (photographic magnitudes).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The first two of the three stars were already known as variable objects in the 16th century, but it was not until the 1970s when their similarities and their possible connection to a certain stage in the massive star evolution was discussed (see e.g. Humphreys 1975Humphreys , 1978Sharov 1975;Humphreys & Davidson 1979;Wolf et al 1980).…”
Section: Late Wn Stars As Lbv Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once known variable stars and the blended star I-18 were excluded, from this stage there emerged 1,722 stars which had satisfactory (σ < 0.10 mag) measurements in each of B and V from at least two different studies. These stars should now represent just about the best reference list that we can achieve-a gold standard-for determining and removing systematic photometric offsets from the remaining six datasets, which did not previously have fully independent calibrations: the Sandage (1962) photographic data, and the Sharov (1965), Cannon (1968), McClure & Twarog (1977), Caputo et al (1990), and Dinescu et al (1996) results. There is no need to impose a selection on the U, R, and I filters at this point, since none of these studies presented U, R, or I data.…”
Section: Examination Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%