2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2019.2892304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-MDP: Streaming With Markov Decision Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pseudo-subjective evaluation method mainly uses artificial intelligence and statistical theory to build complex training models and service evaluation mechanisms for different types of video services through big data processing such as real-time video service quality evaluation based on RNN (Recurrent Neural Network) [19], OTT (Over The Top) video service quality evaluation based on idealized data clustering [20], network video quality evaluation based on fuzzy expert system [21], video service quality evaluation based on S-MDP (Streaming with Markov Decision Processes) [22], and mobile video quality evaluation based on wireless cellular network [23]. In general, although the pseudo-subjective evaluation method combines the advantages of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation to better ensure the real-time and accuracy of video service quality evaluation, the existing research results focus on the quality of service in the single-path transmission environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pseudo-subjective evaluation method mainly uses artificial intelligence and statistical theory to build complex training models and service evaluation mechanisms for different types of video services through big data processing such as real-time video service quality evaluation based on RNN (Recurrent Neural Network) [19], OTT (Over The Top) video service quality evaluation based on idealized data clustering [20], network video quality evaluation based on fuzzy expert system [21], video service quality evaluation based on S-MDP (Streaming with Markov Decision Processes) [22], and mobile video quality evaluation based on wireless cellular network [23]. In general, although the pseudo-subjective evaluation method combines the advantages of subjective evaluation and objective evaluation to better ensure the real-time and accuracy of video service quality evaluation, the existing research results focus on the quality of service in the single-path transmission environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of adaptive video streaming is based on the idea to adapt the bandwidth required by the video stream to the throughput available on the network path from the stream source to the client [32]. These algorithms can live at the server [26], at an intermediate network device [25] or at the client [27], [21]. With client-side protocols it is the player that decides what bitrate to request for any fragment, improving server-side scalability [1].…”
Section: Dash and Multiple Competing Players Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of competing HTTP-based adaptive streaming (HAS) clients the TCP throughput does not always faithfully represent the fair-share bandwidth [29]. Three performance issues that can take place when two or more adaptive streaming players share a network bottleneck and compete for available bandwidth are instability, unfairness and utilization [27]. It is shown that in the case of two competing video flows Adaptive video streaming players provide a received video rate that oscillates around the fair share, but with an increased number of video level switches [18].…”
Section: Dash and Multiple Competing Players Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shared bottleneck may be an edge network link in this scenario. It has been previously observed that such competition can lead to performance issues [2] [1] [16] [13]. The concept of adaptive video streaming (see Figure 1) is based on the idea to adapt the bandwidth required by the video stream to the throughput available on the network path from the stream source to the client [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%