PsycEXTRA Dataset 1954
DOI: 10.1037/e441262004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On a theoretical level, S-C-R compatibility is an extension of the basic conception put forward by Fitts and Seeger (1953). As pointed out in the quotation cited earlier, the concept of compatibility is based on the idea that, by requiring a minimum of recoding or information transformations, the cognitive processing related to a task can be streamlined and maximum performance achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a theoretical level, S-C-R compatibility is an extension of the basic conception put forward by Fitts and Seeger (1953). As pointed out in the quotation cited earlier, the concept of compatibility is based on the idea that, by requiring a minimum of recoding or information transformations, the cognitive processing related to a task can be streamlined and maximum performance achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these experiments will be discussed next. Although Fitts and Seeger (1953) mentioned that S-R compatibility can be extended to "simultaneous listening and looking" (p. 199), they chose to focus on the issue of compatibility of the spatial characteristics of a stimulus array and its associated responses. Fitts and Seeger showed that increasing compatibility is advantageous to performance, and that the advantage persists even after extensive practice.…”
Section: «Ii?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the compatibility relationship between the CR and Warrick's principle, the eight positions were divided into two groups; one (5,6,7) where the two principles are compatible with each other and the other (1,2,3,4,8) where the two principles are non-compatible or non-applicable. For these two groups of positions, the response time was found to have no relationship with S CW-R at compatible positions (5, 6, 7) but decreased with S CW-R at non-compatible positions (1,2,3,4,8).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Response Time Stereotype Strength mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not taking into account the skills and needs of the users would inevitably result in an unsatisfactory system design that would fail to sufficiently support the users' tasks, and consequently demand more training and technical support in using the system. The relationship between a control movement and its effect on a display which is most expected by a population is known as a population stereotype, and such a relationship is said to be 'compatible' [1,2]. For a reduction of human error and response time, the design of control and display configurations should conform to the expectations of the relevant user population [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloned DNA fragments from S. typhimwium have shown high specificity for salmonellae (24). Of 10 nucleotide fragments isolated, two reacted with >350 strains of Salmonella, three reacted with more than 95%, and the remaining five reacted with less than 50% (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%