“…[37][38][39][40] Comparison of Figure 4 shows that the reactivity of nitrobenzoselenadiazol 1 b compares well with that of other neutral electrophiles such as the 2,5-dinitrothiophene 5 (E =-11.57) [35] and the 2-cinnamoyl-1-mesityl-3-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium 9 (E =-11.48), [37] while the reactivity of 1 a is similar to that of the benzaldehyde 10 (E =-12.90) [38] and (2-phenylethene-1,1-diylsulfonyl)dibenzene 11 (E =-12.93). [39] On the other hand, our electrophiles 1 appear to be much more electrophilic than 2-methoxy-5-nitropyridine 7, the least electrophilic species for which an E parameter has been determined to date [31] but, have an E value more than 6 units lower than that of 4,6-dinitrotetrazolopyridine 6 (E =-4.67) [36] and 4-nitrodiazonium ion 12 (E =-5.10), [40] compounds the general behaviour of which are representative of a superelectrophilic rankings. [19,23,25,41,42] Another interesting result is the finding that nitrobenzoselenadiazole 1 b is 2 orders of magnitude more electrophilic than 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene 8 (E =-13.19), [35] the common reference aromatic electrophile in σ-complexation processes.…”