2008 46th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/allerton.2008.4797655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

s-t paths using the min-sum algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the proof methods are different, and results of this paper provide 'implementation' of BP unlike results of [18,19]. We also take note of a work by Ruozzi and Tatikonda [27] that utilizes BP to find source-sink paths in the network.…”
Section: Prior Work On Bpmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, the proof methods are different, and results of this paper provide 'implementation' of BP unlike results of [18,19]. We also take note of a work by Ruozzi and Tatikonda [27] that utilizes BP to find source-sink paths in the network.…”
Section: Prior Work On Bpmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nonetheless, for graphs with cycles, the BP heuristic often performs very well. In network problems, the min-sum algorithm is applied to find the shortest path between two nodes [22] or minimize path lengths and link congestion [16]. For the min-cost network flow problem with linear or PLC costs on edges, BP was shown in [21] to converge to the correct solution (if the solution is unique).…”
Section: Bp Algorithm For Balanced Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w e 1 = w e 2 = w e . One can easily observe that solving LP (19) is equivalent to solving LP (18) due to our construction of G and w . Now, construct the following GM for LP (19):…”
Section: Example V: Edge Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, there have been made extensive research efforts to understand BP performances on loopy GMs under connections to combinatorial optimization [3,21,12,20,2,24,19,10,6,1,22]. In particular, it has been studied about the BP convergence to the correct answer under a few classes of loopy GM formulations of combinatorial optimization problems: matching [3,21,12,20], perfect matching [2], matching with odd cycles [24], shortest path [19] and network flow [10]. The important common feature of these instances is that BP converges to a correct MAP assignment if linear programming (LP) relaxation of the MAP inference problem is tight, i.e., it has no integrality gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%