2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAbR as an Alternative Boost Modality for Cervical Cancer: A Cautionary Exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The declining use of brachytherapy and limited trainee experience with this technique is concerning as brachytherapy is a key component of curative treatment for several different malignancies (6). Although brachytherapy was initially developed because of limitations of external-beam treatment delivery, recent studies have demonstrated that even newer technologies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, result in decreased cure rates and high rates of toxicity compared with brachytherapy for patients with cervical cancer (15,16). Similarly, despite evidence showing efficacy in the treatment of low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, there has also been a decreased utilization of prostate brachytherapy, despite long-term clinical outcomes, single-fraction regimens, and data demonstrating the value of such approaches (9,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The declining use of brachytherapy and limited trainee experience with this technique is concerning as brachytherapy is a key component of curative treatment for several different malignancies (6). Although brachytherapy was initially developed because of limitations of external-beam treatment delivery, recent studies have demonstrated that even newer technologies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, result in decreased cure rates and high rates of toxicity compared with brachytherapy for patients with cervical cancer (15,16). Similarly, despite evidence showing efficacy in the treatment of low-and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, there has also been a decreased utilization of prostate brachytherapy, despite long-term clinical outcomes, single-fraction regimens, and data demonstrating the value of such approaches (9,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial localized treatment of cervical cancers generally includes the use of brachytherapy boost after external beam. The role of SBRT in lieu of brachytherapy for those who have relative contraindications or lack of access to the procedure is an important topic of investigation 3…”
Section: Sbrt In the Management Of Primary And Locally Recurrent Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of SBRT in lieu of brachytherapy for those who have relative contraindications or lack of access to the procedure is an important topic of investigation. 3 There have been few studies that have reviewed outcomes of patients who received SBRT boost in lieu of brachytherapy boost for a primary gynecologic malignancy (Table 1). A retrospective study including 25 patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by SBRT boost reported a 3-year local control rate of 80.9% with 20% of patients experiencing grade 3 toxicity including hematuria and hematochezia.…”
Section: Sbrt In the Management Of Primary And Locally Recurrent Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%