2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2001.00053.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacral Nerve Root Stimulation for the Treatment of Urge Incontinence and Detrusor Dysfunction Utilizing a Cephalocaudal Intraspinal Method of Lead Insertion: A Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aló et al. (36–41) documented an alternative approach to make selective nerve root stimulation. They recommend that a Tuohy needle is inserted on the contralateral skin and superiorly to the interlaminar space, and is advanced in trans ‐spinal and caudal direction until the needle enters the epidural space in the midline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aló et al. (36–41) documented an alternative approach to make selective nerve root stimulation. They recommend that a Tuohy needle is inserted on the contralateral skin and superiorly to the interlaminar space, and is advanced in trans ‐spinal and caudal direction until the needle enters the epidural space in the midline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This report has provided further information on the feasibility and clinical effects of SNRS using a percutaneous caudad approach ( 4,37,39,49‐53). Future study is indicated in measuring, mapping and applying SNRS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of a general inability of early implanters to achieve consistent stimulation paresthesia into many of the T12‐S5 dermatomes from epidural electrodes placed over the spinal cord (C2‐T12), the general indications for stimulation in this region have only recently evolved. Many potential sensory, motor, and mixed conditions of the lumbosacral neuraxis including: genitofemoral neuralgia, ilioinguinal neuralgia, lumbar plexalgia, neural root or plexus injury, obturator neuropathy, sacral neuralgia/neuritis, pudendal neuralgia, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia, coccygodynia, prostadynia, pelvic floor dysfunction, spinal cord injury, sexual dysfunction, detrusor dysynergia, and urge incontinence may ultimately be evaluated ( 37,39,49‐53). Also, early results are encouraging in lumbosacral radicular/radiculopathic pain, failed back surgical syndrome (FBSS), and CRPS poorly optimized with dual programmable SCS strategies ( 37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients who have failed conservative management, sacral neuromodulation is a good treatment option (1,2,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Spinal cord stimulation for these disorders is limited by several anatomical considerations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%