2017
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sacrifice in close relationships: Motives, emotions, and relationship outcomes

Abstract: Romantic partners often face situations in which their preferences, interests and goals are not well aligned—what is good for one partner is not good for the other. In these situations, people need to make a decision between pursuing their own self‐interest and sacrificing for their partner or the relationship. In this work, we discuss antecedents and consequences of sacrifice in close relationships. Specifically, we address when people are more likely to sacrifice, what are the motivations driving a sacrifice… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we hypothesize that being in close relationships characterized by high commitment would buffer lower-class individuals against the impact of their negative life experiences, thus attenuating social class differences in SWB. This aligns with prior research showing that commitment directly promotes behaviors that mitigate negative affect and conflict in relationships, such as promoting sacrifice (Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon, 2002;Rusbult, Olsen, Davis, & Hannon, 2001;Van Lange et al, 1997; see review by Righetti & Impett, 2018) and accommodations for a partner's negative behaviors (Rusbult, Verette, Whitney, Slovik, & Lipkus, 1991). Importantly, greater commitment also predicted relationship maintenance outcomes, such as lower likelihood of breakup (Arriaga & Agnew, 2001; Le & Agnew, 2003;Rhoades, Stanley, & Markman, 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Commitment In Close Relationships As a Buffersupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Specifically, we hypothesize that being in close relationships characterized by high commitment would buffer lower-class individuals against the impact of their negative life experiences, thus attenuating social class differences in SWB. This aligns with prior research showing that commitment directly promotes behaviors that mitigate negative affect and conflict in relationships, such as promoting sacrifice (Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon, 2002;Rusbult, Olsen, Davis, & Hannon, 2001;Van Lange et al, 1997; see review by Righetti & Impett, 2018) and accommodations for a partner's negative behaviors (Rusbult, Verette, Whitney, Slovik, & Lipkus, 1991). Importantly, greater commitment also predicted relationship maintenance outcomes, such as lower likelihood of breakup (Arriaga & Agnew, 2001; Le & Agnew, 2003;Rhoades, Stanley, & Markman, 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Commitment In Close Relationships As a Buffersupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Feeling socially dissatisfied also motivates people to prioritize own individualistic interests over the interests of the collective (Righetti & Impett, 2017;Van Lange et al, 1997a;Van Lange et al, 1997b). Individualism is further associated with political beliefs opposing "Big Government", preferring personal autonomy over governmental interference (Kahan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When individual and communal needs clash, people need to decide whether they are willing to sacrifice for the greater good (Day & Impett, 2018;Fritsche et al, 2011;Nowak, 2006;Trivers, 1971). These sacrifices for and investments in others are easier when people anticipate safety and connection with others, and are generally satisfied that their relationships fulfil their needs (Bartz & Lydon, 2008;Cialdini et al, 1997;Righetti & Impett, 2017;Swann et al, 2014;Wiener, 1993). This is because satisfaction signals safety in the sociorelational bond as it reflects experiences that people have been responsive in the past and are likely to continue to be supportive and responsive in the future (Rusbult, 1980;Rusbult et al, 1998).…”
Section: Walking the Tightrope: Balancing Collective And Individual Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Partner investments, such as a sacrifice, are generally positively regarded by the receiver of such gestures and can trigger appreciation for the actor (e.g., experience a boost in gratitude; Joel, Gordon, Impett, McDonald, & Keltner, 2013; Righetti & Impett, 2017). In the present work, we characterize appreciation as greater felt gratitude and respect for the partner following sacrifice and hypothesize that sacrifice would elicit both a positive feeling (i.e., gratitude) toward the sacrificer as well as a positive evaluation (i.e., respect) of them, but only when a positive violation has occurred.…”
Section: Partner Appreciation and Relationship Satisfaction After Sacrificementioning
confidence: 99%